CCP present CSM with data about how wardwc is harmful for Eve, and ask them for their opinion and suggestions. At the end of the day CCP will do something about that toxic activity and this is only chance to CSM put their sugestions.
The CSM has zero understanding when it comes to things beyond null lobby, even when talking about high sec wars they donât get any further than âit hinders newbies who joined to our 0.0 alliances to get to nullâ.
Wars need changing, but apart from some limitations it needs to come from enabling us to do wars in a different way. By removing the online list CCP forced wardeccers to either give up or group together and form a rape cage in the tradehubs. Choices -> consequences.
[edit]
Also, EVE is a player driven sandbox, so all these âwin conditionsâ silliness shouldnât even be considered. Otherwise they might as well give up entirely and introduce Battlegrounds.
Ship explosions need to be removed. They are destructive and cause massive losses among players each year, sending them back to their stations, rendering players helpless and forcing them to obtain new ships. After seeing the number of ship explosions can one say that it justifies an immediate removal of the mechanic until a new solution is found. 
10 Likes
Not any more, all recently added content are âtheme park contentâ.
Remove wardecs for all corporations that do not have any structures or POCOs. Increase CONCORD response times by 10s, restore insurance payments for ships lost to CONCORD. Problem solved.
To little, to late, no more CPP and Falcon, now is PA in charge.
How much time did you spend thinking this up?
For all my posts I carefully consider the thread contents and the posters, esp. the OP, and adjust time & effort accordingly.
Edit: but I do agree with the overall premise of your post.
1 Like
So far this is the 3rd topic on this subject and surely none of them are in the same space but have all been moved all over the â â â â â â â forums.
Quality work.
Hey CCP wonder why everyone is moving to Reddit? Maybe you should have a peek on how your forums are being run.
which used to be this post
https://forums.eveonline.com/t/there-isnt-a-highsec-war-dec-thread-yet/111248/3
By the way if I didnât like someones topic this is EXACTLY what I would do with it.
Youâre right! And as the other thread has been combined to what appears to be the its respective main thread for now, I guess it makes sense requesting that this one is being merged as well! Just like all the others that continuously come up!
@ISD_Dorrim_Barstorlode would that be okay?
Can you guys make that a thing, please? 
Do we have a main wardec thread and if not, can you just ⌠like ⌠make one? 
remove ammo from the game
wardecs are fine as long as nobody gets hurt
you can still bump people and rp
2 Likes
While some harsh is needed to make things interesting that interest dwindles when people cannot do other interests without being bombarded by someone elseâs âgood timeâ one thing that eve doesnât have is a lack of fights, I know any time I want a fight I can get it, it may not be a fair fight but lack of interaction isnât a problem, problem is those who want a one way transaction and those are the ones whoâs kill board will be a very high percentage of high sec.
1 Like
Prove to me that all those players that went quiet during the dec would stay to become long time players?
Remember the last time decs got nerfed? They werenât a big issue for retention then. In fact eve was growing every year until, would you believe it, shortly after wardecs nerfs and crimewatchâŚ
Ccp did a few years back.
Less than 1% of leavers cite ship loss.
80% of players play for a couple month leveling up their raven then quit.
Far FAR more players leave this game early on without being decced or attacked compared to those that do.
Oh really?
I didnât say it had no impact on retention. But that the players lost to wardecs arenât exactly likely to stick around when they find out about ganking, or scamming or theft or any other of the harsh mechanics that make eve what it is.
And yes, as far as we can tell they ARE looking at the statistics skin deep. You say they did a poor analysis before, but this one is much better becuase it fits your narrative? We havenât been given the numbers or the nature of how they were acquired.
Nor do they suggest that hi-sec violence is bad for retention. At best you can suggest the current state of wardecs is bad for retention. To which a lot of people would agree with you.
Even me.
This just fits you so well. I lolâd
In cases like this one can only have faith in cooler more informed heads at CCP.
Itâs to me a test. After adding instanced space, unload without docking and the ECM target back deal, this will tell us if the EVE we know and knew is over.
The same 10 seconds he advocates for increasing CONCORD response times.
Any thread using the word holistically should be autolocked by ISD.
1 Like
OhâŚwell, this thread just got Kelled.