The like and get likes thread II

Lots of data missing from the info to make its accuracy the best or closest to the reasons related.

Part of the derivate analysis for both WoW and EVE are speculative at best.
It seems that any tests would put the validity of the statements further away from the truth as the accuracy level is from the fact in exact proportions.

In other words, EVE server functions better without population, and the lag occur on the client side more than the EVE server.
Sure, the tidi occurs on the client, but that does not affect the server.
The data is still as equal on the server despite hardware limitations.

As for WoW, the model is different, and, many servers do run more than 50 players, especially for Battlegrounds with 80 players, at 40 on each sides.
WoW does cost more, imho, although they then added ways to get paid time from ingame activity, which it did not offer for many years.

Also, you can’t really count on players base numbers when those players are likely investors, and the reality of it is, the data is hidden from facts published for exact reasons.
At this scale of hardware requirements, systems have to be implemented to deal with the load of players required for changes .
In other words, the costs of running the potential server required can be high enough to cause major losses.

8 Likes

Good thing it doesn’t say it’s approved for what.

8 Likes

Beddy time… today had a ridiculously tough mission in GTAO and after it gliched I just wasn’t in the mood to keep shooting bloody NPCs. So I hunted some players, got killed sometimes, but I killed mroe than I died so guess it’s OK.

Nighties lovelies!

Also: bomb disposal suits, they are… tough

10 Likes
8 Likes

Going away parties are stupid. What if I don’t want you to go away?

8 Likes

The cause of the extent damage are unknown at this time.
We don’t even know what time it is.

8 Likes

So somehow, in a dream, my mind got from its depths this car:


Alpha Romeo SZ

But it decided more fitting name was Arizona Legaria, as if that would help with searching for it on Google. :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

I think stylistically it leaves a footprint. For example similar lamps were later used in some Alpha Romeos.

Timezone everyone :kissing_heart:

8 Likes

Good morning LAGLers!

Here’s a funny number for you today:

12345678910987654321

What’s the fun with it? It’s large, it’s a prime number and it’s quite easy to memorize. :woman_teacher:

8 Likes

image
image

9 Likes

You know what’s funny…? If she wasn’t a public person, this thing you do would be harassment! :rofl:

8 Likes

Really? I didn’t know that. I’ll be more careful sharing my crushes photos on the internet. Also I have a new crush. Luckily she is 2D so I won’t be harrassing her.

Her name is Wendy Corduroy and she is the shopkeeper in Disney’s “Gravity Falls” show. :drooling_face:

8 Likes

Just was kidding… to a point. Looks like certain things are becoming risky business thanks to some kinds of feminism. Yet on the other hand, sharing pictures of a stranger that wasn’t a public person would be creepy… :thinking:

Apparently you have a thing for redheads. I wonder what could happen if I dyed Yiole red… because, right after the new character creator was implemented, she looked like this (I still hadn’t learn to work with lighting, so it’s terrible):

Her last portrait still red and freckles was this:

Then I made her brunette (she originally was brunette) and eventually lost the freckles…

Bonus, the original Yiole:

8 Likes

This happens all the time, it depends how, and , also, what is authorized, and why, and how, and why it should not be authorized.
To try to justify this with dogma, and unexplained facts, especially motivated by unscientific facts will create the exact same direct effect, even if that is for the benefit of the science of propaganda.

Of course , you can publish and therefore share, pictures of a stranger that wasn’t a public person without it being “creepy” without defining what the meaning and proper interpretation of that exact same term used, as creepy, is to be interpreted as, in this context.

It can also be illegal, especially, if used by police, to interfere with critical business at a critical point, or, to change the course of a war.

For instance, let’s say my person is being published as something bad, which I don’t want it to be, and do not intend it to be, and, it even goes further, to justify the publishing of a person, who is somewhat of a stranger, who is not in public, by denying them rights to protect their work, and what they do, so that, it can be forfeited from them.

It works on a case by case basis in case law legislation, and with other factors in other legislation, such as code law, which relies more on scientific conditions, without omitting facts, in scope.

Nonetheless, it is important to protect society when entities administer and intend to suggest stranger that was not a public person, are endangering society so to justify to not publish it, when they are in fact abusing their work, and the benefit they bring to society, so to attribute themselves of the credit of their work.

The same can happen in EVE Online, part of it within scope of the game system, other parts of it, not yet implemented in the game system, but still affecting it externally.
The first part can be (and/or is) considered as an Internal Entity, as part of system analysis of the information system.
The second part can be (and/or is) considered as an External Entity, as part of that same system analysis of the information system.

The parts related to the game system, and in scope, can be modified to improve fairness, or to increase the element of risk, by providing and offering a greater reward, such as the Titans introduction at the beginning of the game cycle, compared to the ability of new pilots, or new users.

The parts related to the External Entities of the game have to be managed by the creator and user of the game, without internal game system, because, they are not implemented into the game, and also because that other rules govern them.

0:43
Data:
Lieutenant , I am dissatisfied with your performance as a first officer.

Worf:
May I ask in what way?

Data:
You continually questionned my orders in front of the crew.
I do not believe this is appropriate behavior.

Worf:
With all due respect sir, I have always felt free to voice my opinions, even when they differ from those of captain Picard or commander Riker.

Data:
That is true, but in those situations you were acting as head of security, not as first officer.
The primary role of the second in command is to carry out the decisions of the captain, in this case, me.

Worf:
…But, is it not my duty to offer you alternatives?

Data:
Yes,
but once I have made a decision, it is your job to carry it out,
regardless of how you may personally feel.

Any further objection should be given to me in private,
not in front of the crew.

I do not recall commander Riker ever publicly showing irritation with his captain (not with is cabagge, as he says) as you did a moment ago.

Personal note added:

Also, it is not only unsound to base actions on fiction publishing,
but it does take facts out of context, and ommits other facts which are not only related, but affects the interpretation of facts, as well as it does modify behavioral analysis.

If , for instance, the so called interpretation of feelings by Worf, as processed by Data, is likely including some peculiar differences, since he is an Android, who struggles with interpretation of feelings.

Secondly, there are differences with having opinions and voicing opinions.
One is allowed to have opinions , especially when those opinions conflicts with dangers that be.
To voice them in a way which endangers public life, or the life of a stranger’s security, who is not in public person can be tricky at best.
On the other hand, if that person who is not a public person has their life jeopardized due to the lack of publishing, when they ought to be published, may lead to the death of that person, would it need to be published.

The same happen when unfair advantages are being used by publishing, and gained by them, and created by them.
For instance, if I do create program for which I do own the rights of creation, and is not attributed to another entity who would be paying me to create them for their use, as a service to them, I do own those rights, not other entities.
When and if someone tries to diminish those rights, and cause forfeiture of them, it is my duty to protect them, and attribute the damage to the party attempting to do so against my rights and security of benefit from those rights of creation.

Additionally, when Picard says, red alert, all hands stand to battle stations, at 1:16, if the user has no hands, he will have a very hard time to do so.
(End-User joke…)
Also, I forgot if Tradewars used captain instead of pilots.

8 Likes

Yiole was also blond for a while iirc.

I’m a healthy, heterosexual man. I like women. Not little boys, little girls nor grown up men. Just women. The hair color doesn’t generally matter but I like women,aged 16 or older and with orange hair. The things I find most attractive in a woman are intelligence and self confidence. Maturity works as well. Character too. If I say orange hair, of course it doesn’t mean I’ll be chasing Dutch and Scottish women without finding out about the qualities listed first.

8 Likes

I’m healthy too, and I rather protect those parties, since I am engaged for marriage to a wonderful woman who is blessed, despite constant interference to the contrary.
It is not only sick to suggest otherwise, but to try to incriminate as well (it is also sick to try to incriminate to the contrary, in virtue of medical work, and medical related systems and their related systems analysis as well as administration).

I also don’t chase other parties, since I have duties to be faithful to my future marital partner, and since it is related to those duties, except if appropriate for intelligence purposes, and without any negative or sinful actions.

Published on Apr 19, 2017

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/history/pastprojects/X43/index.html
Past Projects: X-43A Hypersonic Research Aircraft
Nov. 3, 2009

Last Updated: Aug. 7, 2017
Editor: Yvonne Gibbs

1955

also Mach 7, …
The X-15 set speed and altitude records in the 1960s, reaching the edge of outer space and returning with valuable data later used in aircraft design

It’s the job of military to keep control for security reasons.
When the machines damage too much they are dealt with as war.
It sure is illegal.
AI should not be used for evil intent and actions.
The same faith awaits those who do that (or this).
It’s good to learn self-control to avoid loss of control, and know how to deal with the loss of control, when the loss of control is caused by other entities, including AI.

There’s no ways laws can allow AI to design and implement systems which would endanger life.
It would be ground for war.
I mean, sure, it would be feasible technically, but not legally, and not politically.
It’s the same reason why human decide to fight when their lives are endangered by weapons or , other things used as weapons to endanger their lives.

Artificial Intelligence, can be good intelligence, but part of it are out of touch with reality causing the same disassociation with reality.
The “Singularity” from
# Why AI Is The Most Dangerous Thing You Can Imagine
is a concept already and actively being used for control and management of legal design, as well as military.
Which military system is acceptable without endangering the human specie.

They go on further as to suggest a way to stop aging, which is already achieved by procreation and living longer, and to be living longer, or, rather, as long as possible, or as long as worthwhile.

It’s the exact same thing why it’s illegal to use a computer to make someone lose control.

8 Likes

You keep posting pictures of the same girl I think. … So, who is she?

8 Likes

I use to say, that there is the person you like, and the person you must live with. The outside is easy to judge, like or don’t like but the inside is what really matters. This has been boasted around that it’s lost its meaning.

What matters might be the inside, but nobody is going to give a chance to someone whose outside doesn’t picks their interest. Egnaging with someone is a lengthy, costly process, and the outside provides a easy gateway to decide whether to give a chance to that person, or don’t.

I am not attractive, physically attractive. And even as i share the gratitude some faith expresses, when they thank God for not being women, and I certainly thank god or whoever be responsible for not being a woman and thus bearing just a fraction of the burden of not being physically attractive, the thing is that my appearecne makes the list of “women who will never even consider having sex with X” an extremey long list. And the part that’s not on that lsit, the aprt of women who might cosnider giving a chance to a guy like me, is mostly filled with women whose aapearence is equally or less attractive than mine, and certinly I have no interest with them.

Because if there’s something even sadder than being aguy who doesn’t draws sexual interest, is being a woman in the same exact position.

No matter how’s the beauty inside, without a good outside one is left to deal with freaks. And that is not my cup of tea.

This si why, when I tell stories, the tools i use for it aren’t like me. They’re women becasue, well, I like women, and they’re beautiful, even astonsishing, and then I split some of my mind with them, and create personalities. And then they live lives I can’t live and probably wouldn’t want to live (as life is much of an accident rather than a planned thing). My grils in EVE, beign old and well developed characters, I wouldn’t want to be like them. They have good stories, most of them never told. But all in all they don’t have anything in their minds I don’t have in mine… and many things in my mind just belong to other characters, other stories.

8 Likes

Published on Jul 13, 2017

How Humans Stopped Evolution Forever

You tube
watch?v=d2AgV_6HkDI

5:19
secure a good job to buy food for themselves and their family.

P.N.:
what about to secure real-estate property when the powers that be
also try to forfeit that right to residence, against international
rights, and try to get away with it by interfering against intellectual property rights, if conferred by military.

It’s like a deliberate attempt to miss part of it to get away with it.

5:22
more important than ever that people are more intelligent and more
5:29
creative than their peers.

P.N.:
Also not true in my case.
Many people and most people in fact couldn’t and wouldn’t careless about intelligence, so much so as to disguise stupidity as intelligence and use it to justify false belief, and create hatred and justify war against military treaty.

5:34
Realistically, there are only so many jobs in the world and this fierce competition to be the best, climb

P.N.:
This does not include business, for obvious business reason,
business who get paid to omit facts and to interpret this activity
as intelligent, no matter how evil and illegal this omission may be
into causing loses of income, or even death and end of existence of
family and family name, or holy family name to seize to be.

5:36
the ladder and steal more prestigious jobs
from others has put an evolutionary pressure
5:43
on our minds.

P.N.:
It’s even more crazy to watch this video with the input problem on
my system, as if it would be how they try to get away with poor
work, and poor technical work, and disguise it as intelligent when
it is a sign of how they are not intelligent enough to make it
function properly, and that they are trying to disguise this
malfunction which acts as a weapon , as an error, when it is not.
The same misrepresentation of facts which is used and suggested and
leading to problems is also not acted upon for over 20 years, and
covered the same way.

mental acuity is now the…

5:39
the ladder and steal more prestigious jobs from others
has put an evolutionary pressure

P.N.:
stealing jobs, or stealing more prestigious jobs ,
or stealing more prestigious jobs from others are all illegal
activities, all 3 of them , within their own scope.

As excuse to get away with theft and robbery of my work?
Not so.
It could (or would) also be ground for war.

Again, it’s like a deliberate attempt to miss part of it to get away
with it.
And they keep trying to be doing it over and over again, no matter
what.

Doesn’t that have anything to do with the evolutionary pressure of
how you’re trying to get away with stealing, or is the end of your
theft arrived to its end, and you’re actually confessing to the
crime?

…on your minds and on my mind both, yes.
Or how they are trying to represent it.

5:45
The Flynn effect is the observation that over
time average IQ level have increased, substantially.

5:53
Since 1904, when IQ tests were first used,
the average IQ level across the globe has
6:01
increased every single year, in a linear fashion.

P.N.:
…so, this is going for copyrights, with necessary descriptions.

6:05
Every few years IQ tests are completely re-written
and intentionally made harder so that the
6:10
global average always remain at 100.

6:16
But, if you were to take an IQ test from 80 years
ago you would find it signicantly easier
6:21
than a modern day test.
Human evolution has not stopped, far from
it, but it’s goals have changed.

PN (Personal Note Added).:
Goals of human evolution?
It seems that it’s rather the goals of the group of humans who
decide to take actions and cause problems of theft as you describe
above.
Those who are stolen their work from them are in no way , shape, or
form, able to provide you with evolution in regards to how they can
protect their security which is being attacked by their theft.

6:31
mental acuity is now the next target of natural
selection.

PN.:
of their natural selection, or , rather,
of their decision to be seen as that,
even though it may very well not be,
if they are thieves.

6:37
So, it looks like that X-Ray vision might have
to wait, shame.

PN.:
Do I detect an allusion to super-hero power from American comics?
And what about that allusion to shame?
Isn’t that something negative and not as intelligent as it could be, and that the group you are sharing with is trying to take advantage of using?
Hoping to get away with it as something intelligent and not lacking efficiency, without lack of acuity?

6:41
So, we’re evolving culturally, although that’s
very hard to believe looking at the current
6:44
state of contemporary music.

PN.:
What does music and IQ have in common?
What does it even have anything to do with evolution in fact?
And how?
After all, it would be unfair and unscientific to attribute credit to a legal system which does not measure this with realistic means and scientific numbers, and instead try to create illusion of intelligence by artificially using figures not related to the real system, scientifically so.

6:47
But, what about physically?

6:49
It this really all we’re getting?

6:51
Has humanity peaked ascetically and mechanically?
6:55
Well, that may not be entirely the case.
7:00
It’s generally accepted the evolution has
been slowing down since the dawn of human

PN.:
Generally accepted, how so exactly?
How is it generally accepted, or how is the exactitude of the fact that it is generally accepted is not described or verified.
Why and how would this affect the subsequent suggestive comment?

7:04
civilisation.

7:05
But we shouldn’t quick to put a definite
end on physical evolution, after all, mutations
7:13
don’t occur overnight, they take tens, sometimes
hundred of thousands of years to take hold.

hind·sight
ˈhīn(d)ˌsīt/
noun

  1. understanding of a situation or event only after it has happened or developed.
    " with hindsight , I should never have gone"

and
superfluous

There are also transfer of land and properties under certain military laws and spoils of war, which they may never see.

There also has representative powers of the Queen, which, if you verify , means exactly what it does mean. In fact, if you were to represent those representative powers any differently than they are meant to be, they would not be exactly as they are in fact.

Edit:
Additionally,
to attribute false damage from false source, to diminish the level of responsibility for damage caused from oneself is seen as a form of mischief.
Especially when the report of damage to others are false, and the information was being used to report damage caused to them by others, while the wrongful accusers were also trying to interfere against the communication of damage, while getting paid, disregarding the damage in both ways.

It’s also illegal to try to make money by fears, and to instill fears on others.
Terrorism is an illegal type of activity which does make money by mean of creating fears by force, and striking terror into others.
It’s no better to offer services based on fear of false facts, or to incriminate people based on fear which are not real and created by the accusers, with the intent to deceive.

9 Likes

She is Hayley Williams. She is the vocalist of the rock band Paramore. Even though Paramore was formed in 2004, I only heard about her in 2011. She started with red hair, then orange hair and finally blond hair. I like her with the orange hair most. She was also chosen as “the sexiest female” by a teen magazine 3 times. I don’t know her personally.

p.s. : She makes emo music too.

9 Likes

Ooh, baby…

10 Likes