Clearly shows sponsored. I so wanna buy all this plushes… Save me…
Fair enough. I barely skimmed it when it was posted.
However, I’m still going to lay the bulk of any blame on people being lazy and not the business.
Caveat Emptor.
Now tell me how many people
- read that it’s sponsored
- understand what that means
- give a ■■■■ about it?
You’re back at 1%.
You guys went over 2000
It wouldn’t be there, either, if people didn’t use it.
But you are still blaming the business for the people too lazy to use it properly.[quote=“Linus_Gorp, post:2006, topic:3802, full:true”]
Now tell me how many people
read that it’s sponsored
understand what that means
give a ■■■■ about it?
You’re back at 1%.
[/quote]
And they didn’t even notice
When I brainwash someone into killing someone else, does that then mean I’m a totally innocent person? Is the person I deliberately manipulated into something he didn’t want to do fully responsible for what he did?
I always get Papa John’s pizza. They never got my request wrong since I don’t get cheese
-braces for comments on ‘no-cheese’ pizza-
Miiral got the 2k post
Apples and oranges.
I’m fairly certain that a Google sponsored ad wasn’t actually trying to kill anyone.
mine
It’s about abstract thinking…
They just buld an algorythm that sends them to page 2 or 3 even if their user ratings are better than those from GoogleShopping partners. Not to mention GoogleShopping partners are displayed as adverts, not just produced as top ranked search results.
The point is, monopolies will not stop doing what’s wrong unless you force them to. To them, “Hah, sue me!” may be a joke, until a political organization representing 550 milion people actually sues them and, after 7 years, goes into punishment mode.
Oh snap! Congrats!!
If in your abstract thinking you equate advertising on a search engine to brainwashing people to kill others, then you and I are done with this conversation.
1st phase complete
My work computer is broken
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit