Threads like this are like the base of the food pyramid where we need like 6-11 of these at the same time where we argue over who’s gameplay and resident sec is less opportunity cost lost.
So what if I like to club baby seals? Don’t kink shame me!
No idea, I have no idea how toxic douchebags feel since i’m not one of them
You seem closed minded.
Become one with the douchebag
If your only joy is hurting something that doesn’t fight back, that’s your limited intellect, sorry the average highsec ganker is an alt/bot or just a loser who couldn’t finish a level 3 security mission if they tried.
We cannot all be born with your genius, AJ.
Gankers are only playing the easy mode of Eve Online!
So what if I find level 3 security missions hard?
That is not a very friendly and including thing to say. I feel bullied!
Unfortunately inclusive can’t include toxic elements, you people can reform or try to tear down the game around you but eventually there’ll be nothing left and you’ll be flipping coins to see who among your friends gets ganked next.
If my friend gets ganked, he got ganked. He deserves it for being incompetent.
I think it is just terrible that Test attacked Goonswarm. Some of those Goonswarm guys might unsub if they lose that war. What a waste.
So imagine the future if you get your way. All the human players that don’t actively gank or antigank have left the game, all that’s left are the large scale bot powered alliances, a few suicide gank corps, and ccps bots. Will you find that a satisfying environment?
Like imagine code trying to fight against a real alliance XD
Sounds like a pretty fun game to me. Perfect opportunity to sharpen those programmer skills.
So what is it then? Are there players in the game or only bots?
The bot powered alliances are pretty good at wars, you really think goonswarm and horde don’t have large scale bot operations?
Ok, just wanted to make sure we are talking about bots. That would indeed be a fun game.
Like a more elaborate “Screeps”. I’d spend money on that. Make it happen.
Why are you assuming that gankers ‘have it their way’ when all the non-gankers have left the game?
For a healthy EVE we need both agressors and people who were actually trying to make their money another way when they got into that gank unwillingly.
Except the suicide gank culture has no risk, it’s all reward. If you want zero risk yourself and all the risk on your target, you want an unsustainable system where your targets leave eventually. The perpetrators can collect the loot on neutral accounts and generate virtually infinite isk, throw in a combat scripted bot or 6 and now you’re harvesting navy loot as well, so a person on a high end machine can literally be their own suicide fleet + loot collectors, with no risk of loss other than from other suicide gankers attacking their cleanup ship. It’s a loophole of toxicity and needs to be worked on, unfortunately ccp is terrified of alienating certain addicted subscribers from the game who enjoy this system, and so they tolerate exploits within a certain level, but until the game grows beyond relying on addicts and regretful purchases, it will always be limited in scale.
Or they are playing within the confines and rules of highsec. Maybe move your operation to null for a different kind of risk
I’m not addicted to salty tears! I can stop anytime I want!