What a bunch of ignorant nonsence! We aren’t led by “multiple” corporations - each Corporation is its own State within Caldari State, that have their own management apparatus. Unlike Federals we don’t NEED propaganda. Corporations keep workers not by empty promises of “freeduhms” and “democrazies”, but by actually creating jobs, providing services, living conditions. Corporations don’t feed people with empty promises or ideals. Corporations create goods, material things that you need or want. Corporations don’t try to hold their workers - it’s workers who are trying to hold to their positions in corporations, trying to climb higher to get more and more commodities that “capitalist society” produces.
It’s the Federation who need to try to hold their people from running away, since it doesn’t give them anything except their propaganda. In the State people stick to corporations, because they can “milk” them for profits. Corporations create profits and all the employees profit on that. The worst that Corporation can do to employee is to… fire them. And for Caldari it’s the worst that could happen in life.
“A state built on corporate capitalism, the Caldari State is run by a few megacorporations which divide the state between them, controlling and ruling every aspect of society.”
[…]
“To curb their aggressive tendencies, the Caldari actively pursue and sponsor a range of sporting activities. Many of these are bloody, gladiatorial-like competitions, while others are more like races.”
CoughCough SPONSOR CoughCough and it’s also worse than a “weird Gallentian lifestyle propaganda”
I bring two points, and as usual, you only bother to argue against one. Even worse, you’re still wrong. No, Ms. Kim, the “mirroring” of accusations has no relation to the factual basis thereof. Your explanation is entirely correct, which I agreed with and built on, but no matter whose accusations are correct, neither party will accept the other to be correct, and thus the mirroring occurs.
In short, your argument, that you aren’t “mirroring” an accusation if you’re right, does not actually annul the fact that tossing the same accusation back and forth with varying attempts to legitimize it, like playing catch with a hand grenade (which, though you both seem to expect it to devastate the other, is a dud that physically cannot explode), is still a “mirroring” of actions.
That’s completely outside your definition of extremism here. As you described, and correct me if I’m wrong: you can’t seem to explain your position in a way your opposition can understand, so you’ve started making points to attack the opposing viewpoint, and the way you’re flirting with the third stage of communication breakdown (blindly insulting the other party, which you haven’t really done yet, but it looks like we’re getting there), I’d just rather ask you to shut up before this could potentially turn into an ugly blowout, because you both already look ■■■■■■■ childish, and it’s a disgrace to humanity as a whole that kind of foolishness can be considered acceptable debate.
Don’t forget that this being recognized all the negative things and the positive ones that Gallente committed at the start of the chat. Furthermore he also reported his experience, witnesses and facts to answer at the opposition topic that, for most part, has always insulted at the end of its explanation.