Upcoming Changes to Drone Aggression

That was my point a few posts ago.

I wasn’t complaining, I was simply pointing something out.

Speak for yourself.
My only interest in EVE is to have fun, not to bloat my ego with pixelated accomplishments.

If they’re doing something else on another client, are they afk? Or are they there doing something on the other client? It’s one or the other. AFK or not. Pick.

Also, it could have just been new players panicking as their alarms went off. Who knows. That’s not important. But it’s nice to see you have your evasive maneuvering skills maxed.

You seemed to miss the point of the previous posts in that thread. The pvp situations where this change would greatly effect the experience is in the case of a keres. Normally, you could find a target, point it and sensor damp it to where you could hold onto it (depending on pilot skill) nearly indefinitely, or until it runs out of PVE targets or the RNG gods decided drones want you next. Now, a keres pilot is immediately attacked after the drone’s current target.

This scenario has been brought up already before, and you didn’t understand it then, I don’t expect you to get it this time either.

And yet you bitched and moaned when I agreed with you. Such is life.

I didn’t ■■■■■ and moan and I said so when I posted but if you want to play kids’ games then YOU are also bitching and moaning and whining like a little ■■■■■ about too much chaff and not enough wheat.
See, two can play that childish game.

You still are.

Whatever, Sherlock

They do actually read all this chaff anyway. Even though it wastes their time.

Why would they read them ? You said yourself it’s a waste of their time.
Are they so dumb that they want to waste their time?

Because someone is paid to.

Because until they read it they don’t know if it is a waste of time, or if they will find a good idea somewhere in the discussion.

Someone is paid to read these forum? I seeiously doubt that.

They have a Community dev who browse the forums and anything worth looking at, they distill for the devs. The Community dev knows their stuff and is able to sift through most of the whiney garbage pretty easily.

1 Like

Those Community Devs for one.

1 Like

You wish.
It’s been proven tile and again that they ignore suggestions and have done so for many many years.

To be fair like 99.999% of suggestions are all absolute trash.

You mean the mods here? Those aren’t EVE developers. They’re just here to shut down threads.

You missed that “or” right there in my comment.

Either way, doesn’t matter if they were AFK, or simply not paying attention to their ratting ship.

If a player wants a passive isk making income, theres already PI, mining, industry, etc.

You can also do that with multiple accounts.

What CCP doesn’t want is people passively making a ridiculous amount of money passively, inflating the economy and making it harder and harder as time goes on for players who aren’t multiboxing, or already filthy rich, to be competitive.

Heard about the meme of EVE new player retention rate?

If new players have an easier time being competitive without the need of flushing RL money for quick isk, or multiboxing to print out inhuman amounts of isk, then maybe they might stick around a bit more withtheir single account.

As long as CCP manages to grasp 5 new players in case a multiboxer leaves with their 5 accounts, they are much better off rather than even, as the 5 separate players are more likely to go out and generate dynamic content, unlike the 1 player and 4 farming accounts.

Anyways…

Oh noes… whatever will ever happen to that one nerfed ship…

It’s not like any other ship has been ever nerfed before…

Oh noes, I guess players will need a different ship now…

Hopefully CCP can bless them with a free new ship replacement program and skill point return for such a grave sin they have commited…

RIP Drakes… oh, nvm, I mean Keres.

No, actually Community Devs.

Maybe. And that’s why they don’t read these forum.

Not following your suggestion does not mean it was ignored.
They read suggestions, discuss the ones that have actual merit, and have even made changes off suggestions