Baby tossed out with the bathwater.
So glad I stopped all my subs.
Game over.
4 Likes
So sad.
Listen to the players? Na, we will just do as someone who doesn’t play the game feels. It shows with the care that CCP puts into listening to their customers.
It is an election but you can’t vote. Which makes sense for the CCP. The initials say it all.
Blackout is back, in a way. The player numbers are dropping. Next week below an average of 18,000?
Stop. Look. Listen.
7 Likes
Blackout didn’t work out for them. Now they are trying the opposite.
2 Likes
You know what else is dumb about the cloak change, why doesn’t decloaking a player cause a flag? It is an invasive act.
These devs haven’t the faintest clue how EVE works.
1 Like
Let us hope that the bug that slipped through QA in regards to disabling propulsion modules near the new gates is not a foretelling of a planned future removal of the MWD + cloak tactic so many of us use. 
1 Like
Make this chage make a sense.
Cloak stabilization, give for pilot a fatigue for make the decloak and recloak.
Randomly cloak fatigue, to inhibit automation, % for positive chance to get more time or not. Make this for easy monitoring cloak pilots.
I kwon rules
but fix time 15 minute, is easy for automation, for afk cloak camp.
With the release of the observatory I will be re-subbing my two accounts in the near future. I have already purchased the BPO and am doing material research on it. Thanks CCP for removing what was a major negative aspect of the game. Now I can hunt those that are not active at long last. and my baits will not be the waste of time they were before. Thank you, thank you and thank you.
1 Like
“Corporations can now join Faction Warfare without a server restart.”
Nice addition!
However,
We will have to wait and see if the cloak changes are good are not. I don’t imagine they will be. It will be far easier for nullsec and WH space to create assured safety, especially when combined with the interdiction changes. =(
1 Like
I would like to request a proposal, remove the local when you deploy the mobile decloak into the system. Let the system be without local. I think it brings the ballance. What do you think?
3 Likes
Nice improvement to the patch notes! 
Sadly no Pochven shenanigans with the new observatory …
1 Like
@CCP_Dopamine Hey. Saw the stargate memorial, looks neat. I am wondering if top 10 names are supposed to be clickable? Now it’s just plain text.
why does CCP insist on coming up with clunky solutions to problems that dont exist? if the idea is to make claoaky campers be active players. the original observatory approach was simple. they simply have to move when pinged, oh yes, and for brief moments they are exposed (40% chance)
but no, it has now become a 1 button safe which requires little effort and no exposure. thanks for nothing ccp
Little exposure. Not none. It can’t be dropped within 1000km of anything you could get safe on. So when you drop it, you are exposed.
has anyone tested the buff mechanic yet? do you have to decloak to apply the buff?. if not, then risk is minimal. so other than afk camping, the cloaky is not at risk
Yes, you need to decloak - then wait out the timer, then recloak.
1 Like
Exposed? So what, they put the thing in empire space but didn’t flag the person using it as an aggressor.
So if someone decloaks you you have no right to attack them.
It is so poorly thought out .
1 Like
Forcing cloaked ships to prove their activity by decloaking is a ■■■■■■■ stupid ill thought out mistake and I’m mad at you guys for it. Did any of you read the cloaky threads where your community has been discussing why thats a bad idea for literal years?
4 Likes
CCP doesn’t listen to players. They listen to the CSM.
2 Likes
Why would you need kill rights in lowsec or nullsec, and why would you bother with this thing in highsec?
Sometimes…