You mentioned man made fire. Man causes that for his profit.
Cows are much more profitable than some young saplings and some frogs.
You mentioned man made fire. Man causes that for his profit.
Cows are much more profitable than some young saplings and some frogs.
Correct me if Iām wrong, during Blackout players outrage was mostly due to no local. Ratters couldnāt rat and stopped logging in, and hunters couldnāt hunt because of that.
But there was also Drifter invasion at that time, and people did show up for timers and did fight Drifters.
Why couldnāt CCP try burn mineral stashes, supers and such that way. Drifter invasion 2.0. They could make them bash structures, loot, build their hives, which would hold part of loot. For anyone to claim. Like ESS. Redistribution phase.
Iāve seen some stupid things things written in here by people without a clue trying to argue a position, butā¦Dudeā¦WTF???
I could write a full thesis on how bad your take on this is.
Mr Epeen
Respect to CCP for keeping course and and not giving in or caving to the mob who are crying to stop scarcity, most people wo left will come back. I have more fun now that i ever had with eve.
Chaos era best era. CCP deserves one had pat for not giving in.
Adapt or die, burn all the mineral staches and T2 BPOs.
The forest regrows without all the dead trees and debris getting in the way.
Takes years to decades tho, innit?
You mentioned man made fire. Man causes that for his profit.
They also do it for forest and wildlife conservation.
A controlled or prescribed (Rx) burn, which can include hazard reduction burning, backfire, swailing or a burn-off, is a fire set intentionally for purposes of forest management, fire suppression, farming, prairie restoration or greenhouse gas abatement. A controlled burn may also refer to the intentional burning of slash and fuels through burn piles. Fire is a natural part of both forest and grassland ecology and controlled fire can be a tool for foresters. Hazard reduction or controlled burnin...
Takes years to decades tho, innit?
Yeah this isnāt a literal forest fire.
Yeah this isnāt a literal forest fire.
Might still take years to recover player count.
Iāve seen some stupid things things written in here by people without a clue trying to argue a position, butā¦Dudeā¦WTF???
I could write a full thesis on how bad your take on this is.
This just sums you up.
Well it may. So CCP are playing the long game. Thatās good!
You donāt think theyād just buy cheaper ships?
Yeah and spoil the fun of flying what they think itās FUN to fly. so ccp nerfing your fun at the game. If you are a hardcore player yeah y would use corvettes if needed but I donāt think majority of players fit into hardcore player base. There are other aspects of the game still more attractive or even other games ā¦
Adapt or die, burn all the mineral staches and T2 BPOs.
Same applies for mobile observatories? I see a lot of crying about taking that step back too
For long game they would probably use sheep after removing all the trees, like it happened in Iceland before.
As in agrarian societies everywhere, the settlers began by cutting down the forests to create fields and grazing land. Sheep were important as a source of wool from the outset, but by about 1300 they had become a staple source of food for Icelanders as well.
Now youāre talking about cutting down forests. Like you couldnāt twist my analogy to your agenda so you created a whole new oneā¦
Yes it does. If a ship costs 5x more ppl wonāt undock it often as they did before, so less content.
The wanton dropping of caps reduced significantly prior to scarcity. Scarcity might make people use them even less for some purposes but it didnāt start the path of reduced droppings by a long shot.
I could write a full thesis on how bad your take on this is.
You really donāt have to, there are hundreds of papers available on the subject.
Funny though how a fire happens to start and burns through 500 acres of previously untouched bushland, only to be āimprovedā by the owners as āpastureā.
CCP has officially rolled scarcity out to pilot numbers too. We are back to 2006ish levels of daily logins.
Scarcity must end or EVE WILL DIE.
The wanton dropping of caps reduced significantly prior to scarcity. Scarcity might make people use them even less for some purposes but it didnāt start the path of reduced droppings by a long shot.
Um not worried about cap droppings even a bit. Caps are needed to hell already .they can be taken out by a small gang if they know what they doing
the long game.
The long game,
You mean PAās long game.
Eventually saving the day by selling us 0.99$ Orepacks.
ā¦
Give it 4-6 months and weāll see the same kind of ads on the launcher, itās been habit ever since the PA sellout.
Higher-tier industry (faction ships, battleships etc) seem to be beyond the reach of casual and part-time industrialists. But I guess it means more reward for those industrialists who specialize or join a bloc
I thought ccp wanted players to spread? why they making them gather to main blocks?
But I guess it means more reward for those industrialists who specialize or join a bloc. There are other areas of industry that are accessible for casual players. You can still make some isk by building t1 ships near low sec for example.
been there for a long time. Even that market is going down as ppl are just not up to trow ships away like before