No.
It does require planning ahead tho. And making some calculations to make sure you’ll break the tank and pop the target before CONCOKKDEN shows up.
And, you do have to keep a list of those you’ve previously ganked because if you nail them a couple of times, CCP could construed it as harassment.
But I’m looking at it through the lens of a solo ganker when I used to do it in the Ani constellation.
Bah…the ‘antigankers’ would have to lose security status rather than slipping in on kills that Concord are already making. That’s if they survived the gate guns and the Tornados shooting them from 150km. Bring it on !
Anti-gankers are like the ignorant tourists who go on safari trips. They watch the wild animals, and when they see a lion about to pounce on a gazelle, they make a lot of noise to spook the former and/or alert the latter to the danger, interrupting the hunt. Then they cheer and celebrate, thinking that they did a good deed that day. A selfless, noble act they performed that they can brag about to all of their friends!
Using Kill Mails in the manner that you arw using them is against the EULA.
Based on your past posts, your posting of kill mails is not within any discussion of modules or ships.
Your post is no different from the post you threw the radio at the guy.
All you are showing are ganks.
No dates, which means those are at least five year old kill mails.
Whoring on old kill mails is lame.
Where is your name at on any of those ganks?
Box of tissues for the real world.
Where is your… oh wait, there it is.
Maybe you mistaken what he wrote or I’m just missing something. 
He was asking about antiganking.
The mechanics are similar to a Sansha’s Incursion. Instead of simply harvesting sites until the incursion ends, the insurgency remains permanent until the FOB is destroyed.
Sounds interesting.
Fascinating.
I misread it as ganking.
May bad.
I wouldn’t know about antiganking. I’ve done it a couple of times and was able to manage it. Not because I wanted to help the ungrateful entitled bear who would never know because they were afk, but because I wanted to see if I could do it.
It requires planning, watching d-scan. Pre-aligned to the miner, and getting lucky.
Not really worth it.
Ah!
Now it makes much more sense!
I can think of 2 possible scenarios.
He was running his mouth (in local, and/or on the forums) and pissed off CODE, so they decided to teach him a lesson in game, which he is still salty about. And instead of taking responsibility for running his mouth, he’s pulling the victim card and pretending that it was all unwarranted or
He tried his best at anti-ganking. But given his previous statements about his willingness to burn bears in his blind rage for revenge, I doubt it was the latter.
Why dont you come out of the station and find out?
He really did, but sometimes that isn’t enough.
Dryson was never especially competent.
Find out what? That you’re willing to play the game?
I mean isn’t that what eve is about? Space ‘splosions?
It’s all virtue signaling. Given the extent to which most gank fleets roam about, and that the anti-ganker has no idea who the target may be, the entire notion that they ‘prevented’ a gank is spurious to say the least. I mean, killboard does not have a ‘not ganked’ category.
There is simply no way an anti-ganker can ever prove that the hauler moving through Uedama was ‘not ganked’ as a result their activity. Thus they are left with shooting Catalysts that are already being fired on by Concord…and then regaling the world with epic tales of how they slayed Smaug the dragon.
Ganker alt at it again. 
…and?
Hey!
Welcome back!
Didn’t you quit? What brought you back!?
