Why antigank?

No good without dynamic memory allocation you might as well be a BASIC undock hugger.

I offload processing to AWS so I don’t care about efficiency, at least I can modify the parameters in real time using machine learning to ensure that the right 1400mm ammo is selected for every target. Basic memory editing ensures that the targeting cycle begins instantly, and I don’t lose about 250-300ms on physical clicking and reaction time.

See? It gets results. Over a 93% success rate on blockade runners.

He’s cool. I’ll allow it.

Even though I really want to be an antiganker one day. I would never gank our Princess!

You don’t have to wait! It really doesn’t take much effort to get into it. All you gotta do is find someone to have sex with your wife.

1 Like

Lol, there were over 500 ships in the system that we were fighting in.

Since you want to compare percents, which is non -sequitor, the reason why my damage amount was lower was because of the number of ships involved + the ship type.

A Faux, carrier or dread takes a lot more to take down then a freighter does.

So there is still bo comparission.

Not to mention the amount destroyed within 15 minutes, the time Code sits in a station, far out paces the gankers a single kill every 15 minutes.

Therefore, the high sec ganker cannot and does not and will not ever be able to compete in Low Sec.

Dryson, you should invent a board to post killmails.

You could call it D-Post, or the Bennington Pk Report.

Rank characters and alliances by kills, value, and difficulty.

Combine your metrics to generate an overall ranking.

He still hasn’t defined “real PvP” for us.

I care about other miners and so that much mean I don’t care about gankers!

PvP is when two or more players who pay real money for a subscription enage in combat.

PvP is not Alpha destroyers attacking freighters because the freighters cannot fight back.

I thought you supported faction warfare???

So if a bunch of “Alpha” destroyers attack a Marauder, that is (real) PvP?

Are alphas even able to set safety to red in HiSec? I always thought that was impossible.
Anywho… as an Omega I can very well fly a purely alpha ship. It’s just the other way around that is tricky :))
I did love my roaming PVP cheap throwaway alpha catalyst fleets back when my toons still flew with my old corps.

Gankers can be defeated.

Based on the gankers vanity of their image, all anti-gankers part Aiko’s party can be positioned to comment on the forums instead of ganking.

Aiko’s image is more important than a gank. All we gotta do, post on the forums while the freighters are running, and gankers will stay in station instead od ganking.

A few might get ganked, but AG knows timing as well.

1 Like

Then be a good boy and make sure that they have mining licences.

You do like to make stuff up, dont you?

Hey…all my Catalysts are T2 fitted, 14m or so cost, and can deliver 800 DPS. Throw in the fact that one 40m ISK clone tag pays off 0.5 security status which is about 3 kills…add on a third of the 6m ISK ‘Concord fee’…and every gank costs about 29m ISK. Which is itself more than the cost of most destroyers. Ganking is an expensive hobby. So much for all the ‘no consequence’ nonsense.

2 Likes

Trying to explain ganking to @DrysonBennington

Sure they do. They have CONCORD to do it for them.

Why do you insist on continuing to victimize the freighter? Does it help them in anyway? What do you get from it? SJW points and an opportunity to virtue signal? Which would make sense because most virtue signalers don’t really give a rats fart about the people they are “advocating” for.

I mean take you for example.

You want to turn Uedama into low sec and strip the Freighter of all teeth -via concord- just to prove that they are helpless!

Why do gankers like to bang their head against the wall or post?

(A)

Clone Soldier Tags cost ISKies

/Also note that Permits are also required in Lowsec if you want to farm for those tags too!

Permits Now Required in Lowsec