Freelance enforcement brings a lot of fun to yourself, while shares will benefit some newbro ganker and help kickstart his career, which is also a good thing. Do whatever your heart desires, you will make Highsec a better place both ways 
5 Likes
This is about whether @Australian_Excellence used illegal automation, or not, on any of the 24 accounts involved in the gank.
1 Like
As none of us can determine that, its now about whatever anyone feels like.
3 Likes
No.
Its still about that, and only that.
Anything and everything aside from that is offtopic.
1 Like
Is the topic REALLY a kangaroo court that has no power?
I mean what are we supposed to discuss? The possibility of cheating?
2 Likes
Yes.
Thats exactly the topic.
1 Like
Purposeless except to give you the chance to argue for no outcome.
Cases for the possiblity of both cheating and not cheating have been made.
What else is left to add?
4 Likes
It’s possible.
Did he do it? That’s not up to us.
Conversation over.
4 Likes
Just how wrong you are… you can select target to fire with preactivated guns – it will lock target on its own and start firing the moment target is locked.
2 Likes
Really? I could have sworn this was about a bunch of carebears who are jealous about @Australian_Excellence’s extremely impressive PvP skills. You know because of all the baseless accusations and tears 
7 Likes
Wrong.
A target lock requires either a player command, or an autotargeter module which reciprocally locks back on a target that locked you first.
The rest was explained.
This is about whether he sent manual, individual commands to 24 accounts, or used automation at any point in time.
1 Like
I think that anyone telling you a firm number on what to expect are just spouting a number. Watch Jason’s stream and you will see fluid human movement.
Threads and witch hunts like this are completely rediculous unless firm evidence can be provided. It’s not anyone’s job to prove their innocence, but the burden of proof relies on those accusing.
6 Likes
Nobody here, as a poster/player can decide whether he broke CCPs rules. Only CCP can do that.
But that doesnt mean we cant discuss the incident and available facts related to it.
1 Like
Right and I understand that. I just think it’s a waste of time to hear everyone’s opinion on how many clients a second they think is possible.
1 Like
I give you a simple task : get into any ship with turrets/launcher - even venture will work here. Go to some rats, press f1 and click on any rat. Report back what happened.
2 Likes
Thats because you arent yet understanding that there are limits to human performance, especially when there are 24 accounts involved, as operated by one person.
If you think that is a waste of time, you have said so as duly noted, and you can go spend your time elsewhere less wastefully.
1 Like
Hey look
Another thread where people not knowing how things work comment believing they know things
Module activation then clicking on a target locks the target, then activates the module.
Anyone who actually played the game knows that…
5 Likes
Also, if AE wasn’t legit, CCP would have already banned him (since they probably have all gankers on watch already)
Lol
4 Likes
Hey look.
This has been acknowledged and stated many times over in this thread.
1 Like
Yet you still speak as if it were a lie
Stop being a goofus and stop posting if your knowledge is limited to forum posting
Let the ingame ruling to people playing
4 Likes