Yep…
Ignore the problem…it will go away…
I promise.
Still waiting for the end of the world… 
tick tock tick tock… I really hope you’ll have your ‘i told you so’ moment.
You mean…as always in the last 15 years?
Since i’m here nearly every of my ‘conspiration theories’ have become ‘a well known fact’ after a while.
And the fanboys sweettalk those impositions after ccp made them public.
But still after all this years the ‘i told you so’ phrase is a well known friend of mine you are right in that.
And anybody that is denying this is only making a fool out of himself.
Please quote some of your conspiration theories from the past with timestamps.
Not this way buddy…your imposition to let me search an hour or so in old posts is been seen through and is rejected…
Not out of not being true but out of seeing through your tactic.
I don’t NEED to prove anything…not my job.
Do it yourself to prove me wrong…this is YOUR job…
I am an amateur, you said so yourself.
Your constipation theories have, at best, been mildly entertaining (we’re laughing at you, not with you, if at all) and in rare occasions accidentally accurate.
2 Likes
Ignoring the reality as your kind always does…
A slightly new alt(january) to avoid to show your face does not help here.
And I am accused to use ‘multiple alts(5 in 15 years)’…that’s so laughable…
It’s only maybe half a dozen to a dozen people that jump on me here,many others are supporting me here and ingame so maybe the dirty dozen is not ‘right’ but part of the problem,hm?
Exploration is good in C3 wormhole.From C4 you find only sleeper sites with rats.
Name one.
For 1 Bil. i’m your new best friend.
It’s not you…just any reasonary people in the game…which excludes you…
Can you name one here?
This forum needs more carebears whining about insufficient free AFK reward isk.
5 Likes
Abyssal runs would keep you occupied.
This forum needs more CCP fanboys that sweettalk every crap they do.
Those people do it beside the obvious fact that even CCP/the devs do not care anymore.
Those are the customers every company has wet dreams about(apple customers are a main example here).
Still waiting on the one name.
Well, we agree on one thing at least. Where we differ is that you seem to think that it takes no effort to hunt highsec players/PvE’ers, and this is just not the case. It takes a great deal of skill and effort to successfully hunt, and it certainly takes a lot more than many other activities in Eve (such as being an F1 monkey in bloc level pvp).
As for the risk, 2 things. First, we all wake up to the same Eve and the same game mechanics. Various players and groups can and do fight back against gankers and highsec pirates. The problem is not that the mechanics favor highsec PvP’ers, the problem is that most highsec players would rather turtle or complain that try to fight back.
Second, highsec PvE shouldn’t be risk free either. And, quite frankly, it is super risk free right now. Of course, I am aware of the metric butt ton of players that die to highsec PvP. However, they do not die because the game mechanics skew the balance of power towards the hunters. They die because they keep doing stupid stuff. The players who die to highsec PvP’ers are lazy, impatient, uneducated (in terms of game mechanics, not schooling), and/or knuckle-headed. Those with half a brain and good decision making skills can actually go years without losing any ships to highsec PvE. For example, I have done a crap ton of carebearing in highsec, yet the last ship I lost a ship to war target or ganker was nearing 5 years ago when I was a fresh faced noob in Eve University. It literally took me about 2 weeks to learn enough about the game to lower my risk to damn near zero. And, just in case you didn’t know, Eve University was in a constant state of War while I was in there -and I am not exagerating or being hyperbolic; I do mean constant. Hell, we were usually war decked by 2 or 3 groups at a time.
If anything, highsec is too safe. And those that think otherwise should learn how to keep themselves safe, rather than complain that the game mechanics be further skewed towards prey safety. Those who die to highsec PvP do so because they do stupid stuff, and doing stupid stuff should be punished. In other words, I want pre-Battle of the Bastards GoT rules, and you want post BoB GoT rules where people can do stupid crap with impunity.
Are you serious? I literally told you that part of my chart was based on actual f-ing research. I even provided sources. Of course, I injected my opinion into it when I plotted eve and various actual and proposed changes, but I admitted that as well.
Okay, different areas of space have different mechanics and are populated by groups of differing organizational and skill levels. Concord isn’t needed to mitigate risk in nullsec because because: (1) NS is more remote, (2) you can and should assume that anyone that isn’t blue, green, or purple to you is trying to kill you, (3) there are standing fleets, (4) there are capital umbrellas, (5) large blocs can flash form response fleets, (6) there are intel networks, (7) you can cyno in a response fleet to your exact location, and (8) the aggregate skill level of nullsec pilots is a little higher than that of highsec pilots.
However, Concord does play a critical roll in balancing danger in highsec. In fact, Concord is basically an NPC response fleet. And since there are fewer player response fleets in highsec, and they will be slower to respond, the presence (or absence) of concord has a much larger effect size on the danger of highsec than it would have on the danger in nullsec. Think of it this way, not wearing a motorcycle helmet while riding your motorcycle will increase the threat of serious head injury way more than not wearing your motorcycle helmet while riding in your car. It’s the same piece of gear, functions in the same exact way, but it’s protection is rendered more or less redundant while riding in a car.
It was a simplification, not a massive oversimplification. Greater rewards will increase player tolerances for danger and skew the curve left (move the hump to the right), but it will not fundamentally alter the relationship between danger and activity. Too much danger (how much is too much is dependent on many factors) will still decrease player activity levels. Think of it this way. Too much food will make you fat. How much is too much? Well that depends on your size, body composition, and activity levels. However, that doesn’t change the fact that having a calorie surplus will cause weight gain, while having a calorie deficit will cause weight loss.
Honestly, you have no idea what you’re talking about. We are all now dumber for reading this. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
1 Like
You have been Kelled. Call a doctor before it’s too late.
1 Like
I’m not here for your entertaining…
Or to prove something…
Simply accept that many exist…
If not you can lick my cheesy feet(yes that’s a political correct methapher for another phrase)…