Another option would be the illusory truth effect.
In any event, I am only trying to present better ways to make your case. I’m trying not to come across as offended or haughty, only as helpful in facilitating intelligent debate.
2 Likes
Yes ? Sorry but it was obvious. Well I appreciate it anyhow.
My first answer was to @ISD_Dorrim_Barstorlode 's edit even though I answered after your message.
But yes, I think you got the correct one here.
1 Like
The thread you linked has a different proposal, he wants limited capital access in highsec, limited systems, perma war/suspect status, and he does not want to change the ehp of capitals.
This thread wants a game wide strong nerf to ehp for all capitals, and for their introduction to highsec, for all types, and in all systems.
I welcome all views on the thread don’t worry Qia, what do you think about the proposal in question, do you like the sound of a strong ehp nerf and introduction of capitals into highsec simultaneously?
I do not personally engage in military PvP in any area of space, and I do not fly capital ships. Because of these facts, I feel I am decidedly unqualified to give an informed opinion on combat balance changes to capitals. This is one of those topics where the public good is better served if I take a back seat and listen to those with more knowledge, understanding, and experience on the subject. I am interested in the conversation exactly because it is a subject I know little about. Intelligent debate is the most educational, and that’s my motivation for butting in where I don’t belong.
2 Likes
No worries friend 
This is one of those topics where the public good is better served if I take a back seat and listen to those with more knowledge, understanding, and experience on the subject.
On that I am certain that you will receive a great education, lots of game mechanics to be discussed here!
I am interested in the conversation exactly because it is a subject I know little about. Intelligent debate is the most educational, and that’s my motivation for butting in where I don’t belong.
I appreciate your cautiousness, but don’t be afraid to add in your opinions at anytime! You’ll be surprised at how much you can contribute.
1 Like
You need to consider harder and faster…
The best thing right now for his basically multiple breaches of the forum rules as others are saying is to
1.) Lock his posts
2.) disallow him from making new ones on the same topic.
3.) give him warning to be forum banned if he continues.
He is literally pissing off most of the community.
ok game developer wanna be (i remember when you were saying you are game developer and you can do this better than ccp) Give me one REAAAAAALLLLYYY good reason, why caps are needed in hisec?? I see no reason why they need to be in hisec… The only way I see a need for anything above a BS in hisec, is to take down keepstars.
but IMO, if there are gonna be keepstars in hisec, they should be nerfed compared to other areas since we can’t get any bigger than BS.
you are not getting Caps in HS give it up already Naari.
I tried to get CCP to merge the various “capitals in hisec” threads, but apparently they felt that they’re different enough to leave them separate.
If CCP is okay with that, I’m okay with that. My thread is a lot quieter and easier for me to keep up with anyways. 
2 Likes
Never said I was a game developer?
Give me one REAAAAAALLLLYYY good reason, why caps are needed in hisec??
You would have it if you read the proposal, a combination of increased capital usage/destruction, greater entertainment for highsec residents, and a reduction in capital domination, as the severe nerf will bring sub-capitals back as the norm in sov warfare.
but IMO, if there are gonna be keepstars in hisec, they should be nerfed compared to other areas since we can’t get any bigger than BS.
The fact that keepstars are allowed is another argument in favor of capitals, if keepstars are fine, why not capitals?
1 Like
I disagree with merging them, if I’d propose a limited system perma suspect capital/dread only idea, or something similar, then yes the threads should be merged. But remember Bronson our ideas are much different, hence they need separate threads to discuss and debate.
If CCP is okay with that, I’m okay with that. My thread is a lot quieter and easier for me to keep up with anyways.
Do stop by here from time to time!
1 Like
Oh I do, quite often. I just only try to chime in when I have something constructive to say that I haven’t said a time or two before recently.
You and most of the other posters here know my feelings on the topic. No need to beat folks about the head and shoulders with it. 
1 Like
Now now, remember the more we talk about our topics the better, and the more traction that they gain. We advocates for capitals in highsec need to work together
1 Like
No they don’t. There is still no traction. That’s no more than it started with and exactly where it will remain.
2 Likes
I disagree, lots of people talking about it, I’ve had many great conversations about capitals in highsec, and learned lots about making the game both balanced and fun with this proposal.
1 Like
I disagree, lots of people here talking about it, I’ve had many great conversations about keeping capitals out of highsec, and learned lots about keeping the game both balanced and fun with this stance.
1 Like
Yep and mostly in the negative.
That isn’t traction. None of us have any ability to implement anything at all. What we know from CCP is that they are against capitals in highsec. Fullstop.
Spamming a heap of not even half thought through ideas across multiple threads to increase incursions in highsec, buff mission payouts, introduce capitals…it won’t work.
You’d be better off taking Bronson’s approach and focusing on just one issue that is developed into a good idea rather than just dismissing opinions that don’t agree 100% with your own (eg. your dismissal of Bronson’s proposal in his thread is an example of that).
So oink away all you like. 0 traction is the same as it was before no matter how you try to add it up.
2 Likes
Most of them are members of your corp that you told to come support your complaint threads.
4 Likes
i can’t quote it cause the topic is locked, and i was wrong i said developer when you said
Due to my extensive history as a game designer,
1 Like