It’s funny how when you quote someone else and edit their words to imply you’re smart and they’re dumb:
that is apparently the “cogent and reasoned argument of a superior logician”. But when I point out that your reading comprehension could use work when you clearly and obviously either did not read, did not understand, or read and understood but ignored anyway in order to make a straw-man attack, that is a personal insult?
A bit thin-skinned for a “HTFU and PvP or GTFO” type, don’t you think?
I guess there’s a type of person who only engages when the other person is unlikely to shoot back. I guess a lot of those people come to EVE to PvP, and hang out in high sec where it’s safe for them to do so while they pretend they’re badass PvPers.
When I disapprove of any PvP, that is the style I disapprove of. I don’t even say it’s invalid or that it shouldn’t be in EVE. Just that it is an unsustainable type of PvP to base much of a game on. EVE needs more and better designed PvP, not constant cries for weak easy targets in safe space.
Your own killboard shows that you personally only occasionally indulge in shooting fish in a barrel in high sec, and that you are more than capable at PvP in actually risky regions. So it’s odd that you get so sensitive about calls for better and more interesting PvP, and less abusive and game-cannibalizing PvP.
Perhaps you need to look at the bigger picture?