These two dont mix well.
You are the one claiming all my posts are about education.
Go on then explain how AG creating a secure courier service is education.its all Ive been literally saying for the last whole bunch of posts.
Youve already made it clear you dont think theres much value in being educated.
In this thread, people seem to think AG should instead just focus on “educating” people, whilst having no other further affect on ganks ingame.
Whose problem is that?
I can think of at least one member of AG that is more than willing to think and act like a ganker, and is respected because of it; just not by her peers.
2 Likes
Show me one that wasnt, and offered an actual practical AG method, as per OP and thread, to prevent/intervene in ganks?
Yours.
You contradicted yourself.
No thats a narrative you have concocted.
Quote ANYONE who said this or stand as the liar you know you are.
All of them. You just have some sort of disorder when it comes to understanding the word “prevention”.
salvos, this is why people are advocating flying smart.
2 Likes
Its scared.
It doesnt like discussion about AG methods or developing/consolidating them.
Unfortunately this is correct. The only way to combat ganking is to become a ganker yourself, completely change your play style and give up the things you like to do in game. Personally, I would be interested in AG otherwise but I do not get any enjoyment out of that play style.
1 Like
You dont have to kill the gank fleets yourself.
CONCORD will do that.
All you need to do, is keep the target alive long enough for CONCORD to finish the job.
How so?
Both statements are true and not mutually exclusive.
Gankers will tell you how to not get ganked, and many don’t want to listen. Every single thread in history that brings up suicide ganking is a glaring example of people not wanting to listen; this one included.
Who better to be involved in a discussion about what methods are available for AG to intervene in or prevent ganks than AG themselves?
2 Likes
Believe what you want.
You are utterly incorrect and are now just making personal attacks based on nothing and say people have said things when they have used plain language to say the opposite.
Now you are calling people “it”.
Thats just pathetic.
1 Like
Read the OP.
This thread is not about how a target can prevent a gank, but how AG can prevent/intervene in a gank.
Its there, explicitly.
1 Like
Its a matter of fact per your posts in this thread.
“Education” of the targets, is all you have submitted, aside from your dance around that very fact itself.
1 Like
My posts have clearly for the last hour refuted that.
If its true, quote one.
Preferrably one where I allegedly say not to do anything else, which you seem to believe I said but did nothing of the sort.
If you can’t see an obvious link between the two then there is no hope for you.
Knowledge is power, on both sides of the equation. Until AG step in and tell us what they perceive their options to be and the barriers they face, everything here is general speculation.
1 Like
That may be. Hopefully the trolls wont get this thread locked like the other one. I am interested in seeing what options are out there.
In addition to my evaluation earlier, there is one thing that I always thought was interesting to try: Continue to bump the freighter when the hostile bumper stopped. Kind of like bumping it away from their warp in. It would move the target out of the optimal of the gank ships and can be done with a cheapish T1 cruiser. I wonder if that would be effective.