If you say so, it must be true.
Working for free? That’s literally the funniest thing I can think of. Good boy. pats head
1 Like
So you cheated ?
1 Like
Voting with multiple omega accounts is allowed
1 Like
Sounds like cheating to me. It’s the opposite of “buying a vote”…and yet, the same.
You can not like it all you want (I don’t), but the fact that CCP allows it means that it is not cheating as it’s literally in the rules.
2 Likes
Which means that they are only interested in giving a say to those with the most money.
1 Like
Considering you can’t vote as an Alpha…yes that is obvious
2 Likes
Seeing as CCP don’t care who the players want as a CSM, just the richest players, it is clear that the role of the CSM is not to perform a necessary customer service role, but to pander to the whalebears
2 Likes
Right, CSM does NOT do customer service. They provide feedback to CCP.
1 Like
Even that is a stretch.
Deny reality all you want, those of us with eyes can see what the last CSM has done.
2 Likes
Perception is the process by which each person interprets and makes sense of the world through their own mental “lens.” That lens is shaped by their experiences, beliefs, culture, emotions, and expectations. Two people can look at the exact same situation and see something entirely different because they’re not just seeing with their eyes; they’re seeing through everything that’s ever influenced how they think and feel.
1 Like
You are arguing with ChatGPT.
Just block it.
2 Likes
Amazing how you can see 16 pages of changes that got pushed through by ONE CSM member in almost a year and say that it’s nothing. You may not like the changes, but we are not debating that. We are talking about if the CSM does anything.
2 Likes
If it does not benefit me , it is nothing.
Before pushing anything through , the CSM should consult Zaera
1 Like
No.
It’s always SSDD. Nothing changes except for the big blocs who mass vote for their own to push their own agenda.
CSM is meaningless. Make all the claims you want, it’s true.
You know it, I know it, EVERYBODY knows it.
1 Like
Nothing stops people in High sec doing the same, if you can’t get votes, you don’t get elected.
2 Likes
[quote=“Rocket Hellfire, post:58, topic:498646, username:Rocket_Hellfire”]
It’s always SSDD. Nothing changes except for the big blocs who mass vote for their own to push their own agenda.
[/quote] To echo Malak. Highsec needs to get together and back a candidate. That is the way it works. Currently the best one, strictly my opinion, is Mike.
That is a pretty broad stroke of the brush. If you want change as in anything in this game. Work towards it. Yes, Goons elect their own. He has done a good job of trying to keep highsec from being forgotten, but he needs help. Yes the big alliances do have the numbers. The problem with highsec more than low or null is that there is not a unity. A lot of casual player, new players, and players like yourself that fail to understand. If you think something is useless. It becomes that. Apathy is what the low and nullsec alliances depend on to push their candidates through.
But if highsec flips the script and actually a lot more vote. People such as Mike gets in. Mike has been on the CSM before. He has shown it is possible. But apathy is not going to get anyone anywhere.
I am not saying it would be easy or that simple, but working towards it. Can increase the odds and pay dividends. As other candidates realize that Highsec does have muscle. And highsec suddenly become important and gets the same love.
But apathy is guarantee of being self fulfilling prophecy. Why bother and so no one does. Highsec becomes even more of an after thought. We have a problem with new player retention. Apathy is going to make that worse.
We need a candidates like Mike in their pitching for highsec. We need candidates that do more than give lip service to highsec. Then forget highsec once on the CSM. I am not saying every candidate does that, but enough apparently have at one time or another.
Mike might just be the candidate that makes the devs sit up and take notice. At the same time we have to manage expectations. If Mike gets on the CSM or he and I do next year. Change is going to be slow. It is not going to happen as fast we would like. But the shifts have to start somewhere. This election could start to see that shift start with Mike being elected.
But apathy will guarantee that nothing changes. I find that unacceptable.
2 Likes