Harkon, your claim of victory is premature. You hold Aset and Flos now. Good luck keeping them.
Depends on definition of âAmarrâ, strongly, here.
The slavers set a new precident for the warzone and all the proud and brave Amarrians that fought in this campagne have have signed up to it by supporting Sarums actions one way or the other. They might hide behind duty or the greater picture but in the end they all confirmed one rule for everyone:
There are no civilians in this war.
All Minmatar must be killed or enslaved. There is no honorable surrender. No refugees. Just the dead and the slaves are to remain.
This truth must dawn on even the most naive Matari. The UshraâKhan has seen it years ago.
So call me a coward. A terrorist. A madman.
I am but a man of conviction that will do everything for his people.
I would go further to say, for those that may be concerned, that there are no reports of Amarrian Civilians on the surface of Floseswin. All Amarr on the planet are combatants.
If only someone had been able to look into the future and know that manipulating and enabling a bunch of â â â â â â â psychotics to get what everyone wanted was going to probably get a lot of innocent people killedâŚ
Only if you sink to their level. So congratulations, Harkon Thorson, on letting the Amarr remake you in their image. You are a shining testament to their godâs declaration that all shall become Amarr. So, yes, I call you a terrorist, and a coward.
And Amarr.
I think thatâs quite enough.
This is comical⌠Attacks and insults from our Brothers and Sisters. The Amarr almost silent, What a farce.
Then you should stop being fools.
This here is the Circus⌠The Clown ShowâŚ
Thats a new one. Not sure who you are trying to insult more with this: me or the slavers.
As for me I said I do not care what you call me and stand by it. All you do is make yourself look like an idiot and disgrace your kin.
Let me repeat myself one more godsdammed â â â â â â â time so all of you can get this straight:
I did not invite Nauplius to the roller skating party. In fact, I requested that he, and several others of his ilk, be barred from attending. In response to my request, I was informed that the venue was neutral territory, and that the owner of said venue insisted that everyone should be able to attend, including Nauplius.
We see how that ended.
Since then, Nauplius has been barred from every event I had even a finger in producing, and I have not worked with that venue again. Not only that, but I have been vocal about not humanizing monsters like Nauplius by allowing them to attend partiesâmost notably after Diana Kim violated guest right at a party by assaulting a supposed ally.
If youâre going to come after me and mine, make sure itâs for something that I havenât very publicly disavowed months before. Get off your high horse, Else. Itâs unbecoming.
You should at some point stop thinking everything is about you. It would be becoming.
Oh, is there some other party that Nauplius attended that youâre complaining about?
Hint: Iâve been to nearly every public party since then.
Yes, there have been parties and there are supposedly civilized channels and virtual spaces that invite him, and let him speak of his atrocities, every day, all around.
The point is not who all made the mistake of inviting him once or twice or five times in the history, though I could name names. The point is that he remains. Calling things like the fact that Lord Consort Newelle made a fine show of drama of attacking him with a â â â â â â â spoon as some kind of proof of the morality of Amarr in dealing with him is utterly nonsensical.
Heâs not been dealt with in any real sense of the word - or if he has, so have Harkon and Pol, now that Anna has stooped low enough to calling them enemy.
Almost like turning your back on who and how this â â â â â â â â gets done and then waving your hands at the casualties is the kind of thing we should be able to â â â â â â â predict by now.
You know⌠not emceeing their â â â â â â â pep rallies.
And the point I made is that Iâve made a stand against exactly that. And as far as Iâve seen, others have done exactly the same. If you want it to stop, then yes, youâre going to have to name names instead of just throwing shade from your coward corner.
Elsebeth can be called many things. A âcowardâ is certainly not one of them.
I did not bring him up. He was mentioned by another as an example of how the âAmarr are piling up to kill himâ and I was asked if Iâm going to make an empty gesture like Newelleâs, but against Pol.
Iâm not here to âthrow shadeâ or âmake it stopâ. The âshould he not be bannedâ discussion with specific people does not belong here. My point was to answer the above with ânot very effectively, it seemsâ and ânoâ.
Not that I think the cases are comparable, anyway. I was just irked by the posturing.