So, Brisc, you have seen the final Jita 4-4 model. Is it a giant triangle with red lights?
2 Likes
NDA…
3 Likes
you will not recognize the triangle because they rotated it 240 degrees clockwise to trick us all.
m
1 Like
We all know what a glaive looks like!
2 Likes
They have a very interesting wedding ceremony
Krull and the Damsel in Distress.
2 Likes
for the record? I took a date to see Krull in the theatres when it was released.
m
3 Likes
Heck, I was already married by then…couldn’t drag my wife to see it.
1 Like
We still had a Drive in, when it came out. 
Fellow capsuleers, please be sure to check up on the elderly occasionally.
I was 12 when Krull came out. Girls were icky and not that interesting for another few years.
2 Likes
That reminds me, where did Foggy go? Haven’t seen him in a while. I miss him.
Have you tried rezeroing your sights?
He’s made his profile private, could be lurking, could have joined Mr and Mrs epeen in the sin bin.
He’s not banned, or not any more. This forum leaks that information in the user stats page:
https://forums.eveonline.com/u
If the user is missing, they are banned and Foggy is there (while his banned alter egos are still not).
3 Likes
TIL that this exists.
It’s hard not to create a cynical reply to the OP, along the lines of “let’s not return to medieval times”.
Branding people - players, community members, pilot characers, customers - is a cruel and unusual punishment, whichever way you look at it. There is a reason why the practice is no longer used in modern societies.
Why a player was removed from the game is none of our business. That is private and privileged information. It would put the publisher in an awkward situation if they made some of that info public.
There is no fairness in a “say goodbye to your life anyway, after you served your sentence”. It would be indicative of extreme black and white, vindictive reasoning.
If CCP, to the best of their ability, deem a former customer worthy of renewed trust or at least a second chance, that person should be able to safely, anonymously re-engage with the community. CCP knows who these players are and I have no doubts that a second incident would revoke their EvE activities for good.
There is no need for a “people’s tribunal”. Those never served justice anyway, but only did some “cleansing” along shady, whimsical lines.
2 Likes
I just confirmed with CCP, and they’ve cleared me to tell you guys that “nobody on the operative side of RMT is being considered for unbans.”
Which is consistent with both the blog post and what Mike and I have been telling people.
9 Likes
Very much appreciated Brisc
1 Like
It appears that growing that beard has added even more responsiveness to players questions, as well as to your own gravitas.
Thanks for the clarification.
Hi all,
Following the clean up yesterday due to constructive readinngs, there is a lot of off topic discussions going on and an inappropriate post that has been deleted. As @Brisc_Rubal has confirmed the case regarding RMT which is what the original posts were about - I think it is now a good time to close this thread.
1.Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
Trolling
Flaming
Ranting
Personal Attacks
Harassment
Doxxing
Racism & Discrimination
Hate Speech
Sexism
Spamming
Bumping
**Off-Topic Posting**
Pyramid Quoting
Rumor Mongering
New Player Bashing
Impersonation
Advertising
Thank you
ISD Bahamut
3 Likes