And this is the reason the game will change…you simply have overdriven your “PVP rights”
The sad part of it ist that you,in your 15 year tradition have unlearnd the fact that equality means sharing and not taking all and complaining that all other groups are outrageous if they demand a safe haven where they can play like THEY want and be safe from your playtyle…
Nope.
You already have equality in the form of opportunity, ruleset and game mechanics.
What you want is equity, an equality of outcomes; regardless of effort and skill. To achieve true equity you must treat each person differently according to their abilities; the exact opposite of equality, which is treating everybody the same regardless of their abilities.
Equality is the default setting of the game, it comes free.
Equity is provided by other players, everything that you need to know in order to avoid the predators in hisec and play in a 99% risk free manner is public domain, if only people would put the effort into reading, understanding and applying it.
On the larger scale equity can be achieved through the application of social skills to gain access to more specialised knowledge.
What you do with the first is on you, whether or not you can achieve the second is also on you.
two words : single shard.
The economy of Eve is driven by the fact people destroy each other.
When you stop this destruction, the economy collapses as assets accumulate and are not removed. Which means, basic items (all T1) will cost nothing.
This is what happens in “safe” mmos. They die because people keep their assets, and the most interested people go away.
The reason why Eve is still present after so long, is that there is no “max level” you can achieve : the assets you used can be destroyed.
You are advocating for Eve to die when you ask for a safe haven.
This in and of itself addresses a perceived inequality. If you think it’s a step towards a much larger and sweeping change to the dynamic in hisec then you’re either deluded or you’ve been misinformed.
The single dumbest thing I have read in a long time on these forums. Dude, please, go away.
At least we know he’s a communist now 
Lmao
Equality is just another cake
And the cake is a lie
Even in communism equality is anything but.
Most new guys would be safe from my playstyle if they actually took a moment to learn the mechanics of the game.
LOL…
Prefering one side is equality?
I really must question your education…
It’s no point of “skill” if you have no choice but to accept pvp…
Give PVE a space where the can play THEIR game and -if they like- they are free to enter “the scary zone of the game”
THIS would be equality…
What you prefer is no equality it’s just one sided selfishness…i mean how could PVE refuse to be prey right…it’s OUR game and PVE is just PVP content…
Calling this outragous is nothing but the childish selfishness of a 5 xear old that wants ALL of the candy and cries if it has to give something to its brother.
Balos isn’t interested in changing the way he plays to suit the game, he wants the game to change to suit the way that he wants to play; if he actually plays at all.
My opinion is that carebearism is an attitude, not a playstyle; and incredibly selfish to boot.
I question your understanding of the English language, which IMHO puts you in no place to criticise my education.
i mean how could PVE refuse to be prey right…it’s OUR game and PVE is just PVP content…
Umm I’m a PvE player, and I refuse to be prey every single time I log in; by not acting like it.
Calling this outragous is nothing but the childish selfishness of a 5 xear old that wants ALL of the candy and cries if it has to give something to its brother.
Irony, you being very selfish indeed.
Really?
You question it even beside the fact you out yourself not knowing the meaning by stating the things you do?
WOW…
No PVP is not willing to give space and THAT’S the problem…my demands are in no way outrageous…
Did you actually read the post?
I don’t think so, and even if you did you failed to understand it.
Equality is treating everybody the same, the game does exactly that; you get the same rules, same skill tree and the same start in Eve as everybody else.
It’s not selfish to demand to have the same choice of opportunites PVP has…
PVP can ALWAYS decide NOT to PVP…PVE has NO choice and is always in danger to be forced into PVP…so where is the “choice” here?
Well everybody IS treated the same if PVP is only possible in low and 0.0.
EVERYBODY has a place he could roam freely and those who want a crossover are free to enter low or 0.0…
I find it remarkable that one can call this not equal,because this is the DEFINITION of equality…
The only difference is obvious,and this is the real reason PVP dislikes the solution : LESS PREY
You already have that, to demand more is selfish. What you want is freedom from interference in your game play by default; and you can’t have that because nobody else does either, you have to achieve that for yourself.
There is a wealth of knowledge that will allow you to PvE with a 99.9% certainty of not exploding if only you’d read and learn from it; much of it provided by the very people that you dislike. There is also a wealth of knowledge on how to engage PvE players who don’t learn from that knowledge; also provided by the very people that you dislike.
Your “freedom” from the interference of others in Eve is your responsibility, that interference will always be possible and happens in many many ways that don’t involve an explosion.
PVP can ALWAYS decide NOT to PVP…PVE has NO choice and is always in danger to be forced into PVP
This is why I question your understanding of English, I’ll be nice and assume that it isn’t your first language.
The whole design of Eve is that there is always an opportunity for conflict and or competition, and that every single activity in Eve, including the ones normally classed as PvE, is there to provide those opportunities.
Eve is nothing but PvP, competition between players being the epitome of player vs player; the PvE is merely a means to an end.
You’re meant to be at risk from others when you PvE, because PvE funds and provides materials for PvP in all of its myriad forms.
Eve is hard, it’s even harder if you don’t understand it; which you clearly don’t.
They are, actually. You are in no position to “demand” anything.
Newbro 2 Cents - This eases the tension on PvE players that only wish to PvE, while not making them completely untouchable. Being able to multibox a mining fleet in an structure-less corp with relative impunity is indeed an issue, but it’s not an issue you can solve without also hitting a mining fleet of heartbeat PvEers.
This however does not solve the core problem of massive pirate corps WarDeccing smaller corps and using the system as legalized piracy. Without a scale based cost for the discrepancy in attack vs defender size or scaling cost of repeated Wardeccing there is relatively no penalty for a piracy corp squishing small targets. Small corps that want to have their own Raitaru to call home already have the investment costs and fuel cost they have to debate, while worrying about defending it against competing corporations. A small 10 man corp fighting a small 10-20 man corp is a compelling battle. A small 10 man corp versus a 200+ member corp/alliance is basically a profitable slaughter.
Yes, Eve is a PvP game. Yes, it should stay that way. However, the mechanics of Highsec should be built in a way to recognize a corp taking on a corp vs a corp taking of a legalize piracy group. maybe a
But it is NOT a problem! It is carebear mumbo jumbo.