Well that was rather insulting, I just laughed it off as the deranged uttering of a ganker and mass war decker…
PS I forgot this 
4 Likes
^^ one of the mods everyone.
3 Likes
Now thats done with, here is my proposal:
-Inversely scaling wardec cost based on corp size.
-Wardec maximum based on Omegas.
-Limited Watchlist.
-Locator Agent improvement.
Wardec Cost: Based on size, inversely, so as to enable corps large and small to declare war on an equal footing, relative to their size and the targets.
Wardec Maximum: Based on Omegas, so as to moderately incentivize specific wars. The Omega limit is to prevent inflating this limit with Alpha spamming, and is more representative of the “real” accounts associated with the corp. The specific margins can be discussed.
Limited Watchlist: I propose as being bought individually by specific players in a wardec engaged corp, on a target corp. Ie: The Corp does not get Watchlist. Each player has to buy it themselves, individually. I propose it be bought for 1-7 days, with cost scaling to 7. I propose it be bought through the Wardec interface. The reason to make this only individually buyable by players, is so that though the information can be shared with others, smaller corps, and even solo wardeccers, can get it too at the same cost. (For guys like Kannibal Kane for example)
Locator Agents: I propose Locator Agents are eliminated, and instead Location Services are naturalized into an aspect of the Bounty interface. Result: Location services are bought from the Bounty interface at a flat rate (no standing issues), anywhere in space, based on the level of Location service you want. Targets in J-space are excluded, as before. Locator service will not reveal if target is online, as before. You can use the Watchlist service instead., if at war with them.
Second, optional, I propose the cost of the Location service is reduced in a scalar fashion depending on the current Bounty on that target. Ie: A target with a high bounty, will cost less to locate. This, additionally, returns some significance to Bounty. IE: Bountied targets are cheaper to locate.
2 Likes
Is this Omegas on the agressing or defending side?
The Omega derived limit applies to an aggressors side.
There is no limit on what corps can be wardecced (barring NPC corps), nor how many wardecs can be initiated on them.
The Omega limit applies only to declaring a war, not being a target of it.
Declaring war, and being a target, become two different things.
How many wars you can declare, is restricted by Omega count.
How many wars you can be a target of, is unrestricted.
1 Like
I should be forgiving you, but I won’t because of the lengths you went to try and discredit me or outright ignore me.
As far as I’m concerned you still have a long way to go…
1 Like
I didn’t ask for, nor need, your forgiveness.
The crap Ive had to deal with from you is common knowledge, and your responsibility.
If anything you should be apologizing to me, and thanking me.
1 Like
Why should I?
I’m not the one that was claiming to have my ideas stolen.
Nor was I the one turning a blind eye to hard facts.
Nor the one using those same facts I was denying in my new arguments.
But hey, if you want to blame me for your wrongdoings and all of your repetitive posts, go ahead idgaf
1 Like
I owned my sh*t.
You have not.
1 Like
Because I have none to own lol
I state facts, not common knowledge nor stuff that I heard somewhere on the internet
If that doesn’t please you or your motives, then it’s none of my problems.
Huh, is that so.
Funny then that your proposal doc mirrors what I have spent years and hundreds of posts on-topic debating/exploring/developing as what I thought would work, and taking sh*t for that, including from you.
Sounds like you’re not retracting that first statement at all now…
That’s some deep hate you have for me then 
Not holey levels, but not too far behind
Cba.
If you won’t own up, not my problem.
Why should I own up on stuff that I thought about?
Lol
I too look forward to having all the old problems arising from watchlists back in the game!
As a bonus, we get a barrier to entry which disadvantages smaller groups!
YAY! Broken mechanics are back on the table bois!
Good luck with “your” proposal!
2 Likes
As much as I hate Salvos
What do you propose instead?
Usually it takes a proposal to counter another proposal… not tears
E: I’m in no way defending any of his stuff, just making a point about proposals in general
1 Like
Maybe your emotional attachments are distorting your comprehension.
I was not ‘countering’ a proposal. Rather, I merely point out the logical extensions of “his”.
That said, whoever told you that countering a proposal requires another proposal is either wrong or, more likely, speaking about empirical trends.
2 Likes
Then no offense, but your opinion on the matter is kinda irrelevant lol
You can’t just come and say
your idea is shite
Without either a counter-proposal or explaining why with facts
That’s how debates work lol
i challenge you to read any thread in player feature and ideas and then say that again with a straight face.
11 Likes
I’m absolutely guilty lol
Not even denying that 
2 Likes