Continued Scarcity

[Destiny_Corrupted]

@Leggone_Stracks

I’ve wondered, since catalysts seem the be the most common for gank swarms, if emphasizing kinetic and thermal in your tank wouldn’t be a good anti-gank thing.

Praise James 315 for inventing the Ship Scanner, so that guesswork is no longer needed when deciding on what ships to use against a target.

[Gix_Firebrand]

@Aida_Aragon

It’s not about my opinion on whether they are too slow or not , it’s about the fact it takes time for them to respond , as it should , leaving a window of opportunity for people to exploit .

There’s a loophole in that system of punishment that allows people to commit piracy , that’s all I’m saying and reasonably yes there should be.

Yes, its your opinion. Its also factually wrong.

There is no loophole.

Are you ESL? Cause I feel like you don’t really understand what loophole means.

@Aida_Aragon

Wow you gankers really are adverse to the window of opportunity provided by response times as a loophole aren’t you .

Bro most of the people, including myself, aren’t even gankers.

You’re just wrong, period.

@Aida_Aragon

Not CCP but concord themselves deliberately delay there punishment ???

I think not therefore there’s an exploitable opportunity that can be taken advantage of .

Where I come from that’s called a loophole .

Obviously CCP designed it that way so as you say piracy is a legitimate playstyle , I never said they didn’t , nor am I saying they shouldn’t have .

Wut. You know CCP designed CONCORD right? You know you’re playing a vidya game right? CONCORD responds to an algorithm that CCP designed. Which you admit to them doing.

Are you slow or

@Destiny_Corrupted

Good trolling imitates intelligence, bad trolling imitates ignorance.

I hope to Quafe he’s trolling. If someone is actually this stupid, uh, man its terrifying.

@Aida_Aragon

Close , the concord officer wants to punish you as soon as possible , but can’t because of travel time , this leaves the window of opportunity for people to take advantage of .

By design. Intentional design. So its not a loophole bruv.

@Aida_Aragon

Yes I think several of them seem to think I’m accusing them of exploiting which isn’t the case

I’m talking about the security of high sec and why it isn’t total … lore / RP wise

No you literally did. Now you’re gas lighting and attempting to move the goal posts, most likely cause you finally realized how dumb you sound

@Aida_Aragon

Perhaps your right conceptually but the response time effects capsuleers security as piracy is more expensive and difficult in higher security systems , therefore capsuleers are better secured against it .

Interesting how now you moved it from being a loophole. What changed? Realized you sounded super dumb so now you’re trying another way?

@Avaelica_Kuershin

Most definitely don’t want thermal or kinetic holes, but coercers, purifiers, thrashers, and tornados are not infrequently used. Hard to say what ammo the latter two most often use.

Depends on what they going after.

Peeps use coercers on blinged abyss fits cause they usually rock shield tank. Catas can be for almost anything but ruppies/thrashers/nados are when you need high volley damage.

[Mina_Zealot]

@Destiny_Corrupted

Praise James 315 for inventing the Ship Scanner, so that guesswork is no longer needed when deciding on what ships to use against a target

Are you talking about group play there?
So how does that work in solo play? You don’t know what weaponry they have until you scan them and most likely you’re in the wrong ship.
So you scan them and… dock and undock in the right ship? Supposing the ship that will do ( be useful ) is even in the same system. Aren’t they gone by then? Most likely they’ve seen you scan them so they know something’s up, right?

[Gix_Firebrand]

There is passive targeting mods so they don’t know they are being scanned

[Destiny_Corrupted]

That’s what alts are for.

[Mina_Zealot]

@Destiny_Corrupted

That’s what alts are for

So… multiboxing then?

[Destiny_Corrupted]

Yes. Why not?

[Mina_Zealot]

Ok. Just trying to understand how I’d do that solo.
Thanks!

[Max_Deveron]

according to Lore, Concord does not care about piracy…Concord’s job is to disrupt Capsuleers from unmitigated combat in High Security space…

The Empires do not want Capsuleers to be able to engage in combat when ever they wish to on what ever targets they wish to.

Thus your re-clone ability is tied to Concord Fluid routers, your med bays are owned by the Empires, and Concord is there to kick your ass if you are not paying them to look the other way(ie wardecs)

[Leggone_Stracks]

They messed up hisec war decs.

[Destiny_Corrupted]

Or rather, as the people who shed fake tears over the “murdered rookies” while they themselves are now able to multi-box chain-grind high-sec PvE content in complete safety would say, “they fixed griefing.”

[L_Amour]

@Destiny_Corrupted

“murdered rookies”

Yea. No one gets ‘murdered’ on EVE, we capsuleers are immortals anyway so the crybabies’ argument about rookies getting slaughtered is asinine nonsense.
I do hope the Devs know better than to fall for that line. And using new players for an argument against consentual PvP is pure cowardice and low.

[Aida_Aragon]

Must just be a matter of perspective

To me high sec space is secure except…

To you high sec space isn’t secure but …

[Aiko_Danuja]

@Aida_Aragon

a ‘loophole’ in concords ability to totally defend high sec

This is not hard to understand.

CCP does not want CONCORD to “totally defend” Highsec.

CCP makes money when wealthy carebears die.

CCP wants gankers to kill Highsec miners.

Consequently, CONCORD is not all powerful.

[Aida_Aragon]

@Aiko_Danuja

@Aida_Aragon

a ‘loophole’ in concords ability to totally defend high sec

CCP does not want CONCORD to “totally defend” Highsec.

CCP makes money when wealthy carebears die.

CCP wants gankers to kill Highsec miners.

Consequently, CONCORD is not all powerful.

Yes I totally agree with that

[L_Amour]

@Aida_Aragon

To me high sec space is secure except…

… except it’s not secure.
If it was “secure” capsuleers wouldn’t get blown up.

CONCORD does not bring security.
CONCORD brings punishment.

I thought we went over that in detail yesterday.

[Aida_Aragon]

@L_Amour

@Aida_Aragon

is secure except…

… except it’s not secure.

You just seem to be taking issue with me for the order that I’m using the words in a sentence that means exactly the same thing , any particular reason why ?

[L_Amour]

@Aida_Aragon

any particular reason why ?

I don’t “take issue” but your observation is noted.

I just don’t agree with the idea of New Eden space having anything to do with security, the two are polar opposite. There is nothing secure with EVE’s space and the sooner you disassociate the two the sooner you can have a good time flying your ships.

[Aida_Aragon]

@L_Amour

have a good time flying your ships.

I do that’s why I play , hope you do too

[L_Amour]

@Aida_Aragon

I do that’s why I play

+1

@Aida_Aragon

hope you do too

You kidding? I’m having a blast.
Yesterday I “moved my pieces” to a constellation right next to 0.3 sec. and I had to pick up modules in 0.4 sec. It was exciting, I anticipated to get attacked but, halas, I didn’t.
I used a website to see how many ships were attacked along my route and took a free corvette to go pick up my stuff. I was on edge and alert. It was great.
Can’t wait to get blown up. It’s going to be great, I’m gonna scream like a little girl