Delete

[Lucas_Kell]

(O_o)

[Nicolai_Serkanner]

Reported for spam.

[Whitehound]

@Nicolai_Serkanner

Reported for spam.

Agreed. This is just unnecessary. We have more than enough discussions about ganking in Crime & Punishment. It doesn’t need another thread.

Examples:

Gankers in highsec still there?

There where alots of stupid noobs around in highsec two years ago bumping and killing freighters with 50 Caracals. I canceld my subscription back then and now after two years I consider again to pay for some Eve Online. Is it worth checking back in again or should I carry my money somewhere else?

Ganking, or rather the Right to Gank

Going out on a limb here, posting with myself… Given the talk in the “Take Over” threads, I thought it may be a good time to raise this: As a game Eve needs gankers, or at least the threat of gankers. I’m not a traditional HighSec ganker, with no concord on my killboard ever, but the rights of others to do that ganking is essential in Eve. Otherwise we are just a graphically different same as all the rest game, and I don’t think that’s why lots of us play Eve. tl:dr Keep the R…

Ganking has gone too far

Pretext: I’ve been on and off this game ten years, the single time I’ve been ganked in high sec was an empty covert transport probably 5 years ago when I was on autopilot. This isn’t a cry thread, I’m just observing things getting way out of hand. People are just getting blown up for too little investment and effort. Regardless of if your ship is all pimped out or not it’s still usually tenfold more expensive than the bunch of catalysts it takes to burn it down, that’s just the hull. I’m not su…

Wanting to create yet another thread can at best only underline how much of a special snowflake one is.

[Clockwork_Robot]

How boring.

[Lucas_Kell]

(O_o)

[Whitehound]

@Lucas_Kell

I want to have a constructive discussion over the balance of ganking and anti-ganking.

Then use the existing threads, or your wish to have a constructive discussion and to be constructive fails due to your failing to take part in the existing ones.

[Clockwork_Robot]

@Lucas_Kell

I want to have a constructive discussion over the balance of ganking and anti-ganking.

No you don’t. You want to start another drama-laden shitshow on the forums, so that many pages of insults and petty fuckery can be mined for salt and amusement.

Which has been done. To death.

How ■■■■■■■ boring.

[Salt_Foambreaker]

@Lucas_Kell

The main problem as I see it is that there’s no decent PvP counter.

You mean besides PvPing back?

DUH

[Salt_Foambreaker]

@Nicolai_Serkanner

Reported for spam.

Thank you.

[Nicolai_Serkanner]

Reported for being off-topic.

[Lucas_Kell]

(O_o)

[Uriel_the_Flame]

There needs to be a ganking megathread similar to the cloaky camping one so mods can just merge posts into one thread to avoid the constant spam.

[Nicolai_Serkanner]

Reported for spam.

[Salt_Foambreaker]

@Lucas_Kell

I’ve covered that in the body of the thread. The problem is that as gankers only arrive on grid as the gank is going down and are there for a short period of time, anti-gankers have to do a lot of work and have strong intel just to get on the right grid at the right time. I’d love for there to be a real PvP counter so that anti-gankers actually stood a chance but the vast majority of the time they can simply be ignored as they stand no chance of slowing down most ganks let alone stopping them.

So being unprepared is now a justification to nerf PvP.

Are you going to show us the killmail that caused you to whine like this?

[Clockwork_Robot]

@ISD_Buldath Respectfully request a lock and/or merge on this dribblefest?

We actually don’t need yet another topic “fer lulz” on this, crapping up the forum.

[Lucas_Kell]

(O_o)

[Nicolai_Serkanner]

Reported for being off-topic.

[Clockwork_Robot]

People don’t want the 100th discussion of this topic.

People don’t want to discuss this with you.

Stop shitting up the forum.

[Lucas_Kell]

(O_o)

[Nicolai_Serkanner]

Reported for spam.