Sure and that’s great you think so. However, I’m still allowed to have a different view on that and to look to other members of the CSM in relation to those issues.
In the same way, I wouldn’t place as much stock in anything Steve offers on nullsec conflict, though he’d be the first I’d look to read in relation to industry, etc.
Different people bring different experience, knowledge and skill to the table for discussion. We are all free to rate those skills and knowledge how we see fit. My view doesn’t have to align with yours and don’t be insulted if it doesn’t in relation to this issue. You’re great in other areas.
Overall though, 8 months of CCP engagement with the CSM on removing the CQ, with no wider engagement is pretty crap; and I’m not one of the people upset about the CQ removal. I accept CCP’s reasoning on it.
I just think it’s crap that CSM candidates write threads in the forum about how consultative and collaborative they will be and then turn around and say, well we discussed it for 8 months, but NDA durr hurr. However, that is off topic for this thread and I’m clearly not the only person with this view. It’s been discussed to death everywhere.