Why the hell would I want to ‘verify’ who I am to some anonymous nobody on some internet forum ? You seriously over-rate your own importance in the scheme of things.
1 Like
When its not about time at all. As time doesnt exist you cant say 4 years, you have to use lengths. You could say that it takes 4 full circles around our star for that, but for you only. You have to resort to geometry only, remembering that the medium is moldable and doesnt stay still, everything moves relatively at the same time.
So it is shorter for observer. Of course the point of view depends on who is watching and who is probing. If lengths would not become shorter as they do, everything would be still, unmovable, and that is not a property of this world. If there would be no method of shortening lengths, we would never achieve the states we want, roughly.
Ah, that must be why Einstein calls it…spacetime.
How on earth can anyone commenting on relativity say time does not exist, when time is one of the dimensions in the Lorentz transformation for relative velocity ?
Look…here it is all explained. There is nothing to argue over. She is dealing precisely with your misunderstanding of it all.
1 Like
I have found that laundry and dishes are both timeless. I’m not so sure about photons.
2 Likes
You still havent authenticated your identity, especially after you claimed to be a co-discoverer of Nova Cygni.
What is time:
Time is any measureable distance that energy travels where the energy can be effected upon or effect other energy within the medium that energy is traveling through, as well as the medium effecting upon the energy that creates an energetic reaction or the energy effects upon the medium to create an energetic reaction.
Give it up. You are trolling.
1 Like
Why the hell would I want to ‘verify’ who I am to some anonymous nobody on some internet forum ? You seriously over-rate your own importance in the scheme of things.
Why would you post, anonymously on a video game forum, that you were someone important?
No, its you that has over-rated yourself in your own scheme. If you were actually one of the co-discoverers of Nova Cygni, you would have the same security as someone like Tabitha Boyjian who discovered KIC 8462. If you weren’t lying about who you want everyone to perceive you as being, you would have first gone to CCP, like Michele Mayour did, to present your idea so that CCP could verify and authenticate that you were being truthful.
But since you havent done so and CCP hasnt verified your claims, you are creating a fraudulent ID to make people believe what you are posting by using a mask of a someone who is popular.
No, that’s a definition of gobbledygook word salad. Well done on using the word energy 8 times in one sentence !
And why does anyone need your definition when we don’t live in the 11th century any more and not only has the printing press long since been invented but also this new fangled thing called the internet on which anyone can read what actual scientists say.
Since you’re not an actual scientist you wouldnt even know the meaning of time.
I have two pool balls, the Cue and the 8 ball, 12" apart. I draw the pool stick back and strike the Cue ball while another person strikes the 8 ball. Both balls, comprised of atoms, energy, travel towards each other a rate of velocity determined by the strike of the cue ball.
Thus, time. Rest Time as the two pool balls are not moving but still have atoms that comprise each ball that are interacting with each, the medium, the pool table and the exerted force placed on each ball.
Again, why does anyone need your woefully inadequate description when they can simply look it up on Google.
1010110001110000101010101010101101101111111000000011010101001010101101010101010101010101010101010101010101101010100111100001 try and read this ■■■■ and if you can’t read it you have to give me 5 billion isk for the great work of my corp
Time is only described by lengths. Every measurement is length.
If you say time, you mean lengths, even when you dont mean it.
Lengths change in real “time”, that is now, and you measure them and call it time. There is no things as past and future. These are memories and predictions, and they dont exist outside mind, they are only ideas. Its only now.
Time, like everything science-like on this planet is a purely human construct made so we can explain stuff that happens. Other intelligent life may have their own calculations for their own understanding of the universe. Both are correct, even if the system the other species’ use allows them to do things like traverse large distances in a short amount of time without aging or any of the other things discussed earlier due to the space-time horseshit. I’mma throw my hat in with the Greys. At least they eat your forehead.
No, time is not a human construct. The amount of time the Earth takes to orbit the Sun is based on energetic reactions taking place the atoms on the Table of Elements.
Time Dialation is not Earth based entirely, time dialation is based on gravitational influences and how those influence effect biological lifeforms.
If a human who was born on Earth went to Mars, the human would age differently compared to a human on Earth due to gravitational differences.
Gravities effect on DNA is the determining factor for life in the Universe.
There is life on other planets out there in the Universe. To say there isnt is an attempt to drag a person to the ground emotionally to make yourself believe that you are spiritual guide, that in the end all you want is money and expect the world to baby you and your needs.
1 Like
It really is an amazing fact, time APPEARS to move slower the closer an object is to a large source of gravity. Where a black hole is concerned it’s strange that there are objects which are too heavy for the fabric of time and space itself.
An interesting question; why does space and time seem to have limits? a black hole is a distortion which I’m trying to compare to a truck axel breaking because too much weight was loaded on the truck but I’m struggling to compare a truck axel to time and space.
Also, the fact that parts of time and space can become distorted seems to mimic the operation of a computer or some sort of generated simulation.
I found an interesting video that explains how the first cells evolved, the experiment featured in the video is interesting.
1 Like
Also, the fact that parts of time and space can become distorted seems to mimic the operation of a computer or some sort of generated simulation.
The universe is not the Matrix nor is the universe a computer generated simulation.
When locations in space become distorted, when viewing space through a telescope the main reason distortion occurs is due to heat escaping the surface of Earth.
Other reasons for distortion could be the remnants of a galaxy. long gone, dissipating its light across a large viewing area. Not that the long gone galaxy was tiny at one point but due to the distance of the galaxy from the viewer, the light may appear small but as the entirity of the light from the galaxy approaches the viewer. the viewer is actually seeing the entire galaxy as it was billions of years ago.
Remnant and fading type of frequences could also cause distortions.
There could even be locations in space that for some reason, Primordial Space still exists. Since science isnt able to measure the speed of light prior to the Big Bang, a region of Primordial Space passing in front of the viewer would distort space and time. which could be likened as a Primordial Black or a region of space-time where data can travel into the region but not escape.
The CMB Cold Spot is such a locarion. Is the CMB a black hole? Probably not, Could the CMB be another type of celestial anomoly that is similar to a blackhole but doesnt have a gravitational value? Possibly.
Here is something else to consider.
Humans are the only lifeform on Earth that takes approxiamately 16 years to fully develop the ability to defend itself.
Every other animal on the planet has the ability to defend itself within the first five hours after being born, which is mostly based on speed or having the ability to get away rapidly.
Take for example a one year old lion cub compared to a one year old human baby. The lion cub is more than capable of defending itself at one year of age when the human baby of the same age is not and still relies on a parent.
Even a year old primate, often thought of as the closest relative to a human, is able to defend itself when a one year old human baby is not.
Humans either came from a different planet that wasnt nearly as violent as Earth was, which allowed humanity to take longer to develop or humans came to Earth, after the Dino Roid killer killed all the dinos off. Based on the long duration before a human is able to defend itself, humans would not have been able to survive in the pre-historic period and really shouldn’t have been able to survive in a post Dino-Killer Roid world either.
In all reality, humanity probably started out as a sunflower saying ‘Please don’t eat me, I just a baby.’
No…that is not what special relativity says. In fact it is totally the opposite of what it says.
The entire basis of relativity is that there is no special moment called ‘now’. The very basis of ‘now’ is observer dependent and there is no universal ‘now’ as Newton thought.
That means that the past quite literally still exists. A concept known as the ‘block universe’. It has to still exist in order to account for the different ‘now’ that observers see. Once ‘now’ becomes observer dependent and there is no absolute universal ‘now’…one person’s present is another person’s past. That means the moment you call ‘now’ can be the past for another observer in an equally valid ‘now’.
This is the entire basis of time dilation and the concept of someone going off on a 10 year trip at the speed of light and coming come and finding 1000 years have passed. The fact that relative motion removes the simultaneity of ‘now’ effectively means the past literally still exists.
In fact your ‘only now’ is the old Newtonian system of absolute space and time that Einstein’s relativity replaced. The entire basis of relativity is that there is no ‘only now’. That is the very essence of the theory !
Look…here is a scientist saying the exact same thing…and the answer to the question is ‘Yes’.
Now, only exits for a very brief moment due to the aging process of biological entities, the moment of now for a rock containing minerals is however a lot longer because the natural aging process of a rock takes a lot longer. Natural aging process refers to erosion of a rock due to wind or water.
Time dilation has never been proven because humans haven’t been able to achieve the speed of light yet. You are assuming that time dilation for a human is the same time dilation for all planets which is incorrect. Humans age based on the gravitational influences of Earth. Unless the environment inside of the ship carrying humans at the speed of light is exactly the same as the environment on Earth, the aging process would be different due to less or more gravitational influences being placed on the human traveling at the speed of light.
time dilation, in the theory of special relativity, "the “slowing down” of a clock as determined by an observer who is in relative motion with respect to that clock** Once again, flawed because the clocks that Einstein used were not based on the Atomic Clock but more so the wind-up type of mechanical clocks that never keep accurate time due to environmental conditions, such as moisture and heat or cold causing the springs and gears in a clock to mechanically function, out of sync.
No, the past does not exist for biological organisms. You cannot go into the past literally, because in order to do so, every single dead person would have to be brought back to life. Granted you might be able to study past events but doing so does not and will not ever put in the same time period of what you are studying. The past for a rock however does exist due to the amount of time that it takes for natural erosion to occur. A rock that formed one billion years ago would contain data from that time period that is testable. Humans don’t have the ability to test human existence from a billion years ago as the bones would have decayed into the very base minerals that bones are made of.
Oh yes it has been observed. Numerous times.
Once again…people need only Google to set the record straight, rather than be bamboozled by people who don’t know their science.