I would say they are only pathetic. They cant even not crash their ships on earth. Advanced extraterrestial civilization my ass.
Maybe it’s deliberate. They didn’t need those flying saucers anyway. 
Incompetent, pathetic extraterrestials, same as we, if not worse. They dont show themselves, must be shame of what they made of their own planet that they had to get out of there right here on the human populated planet. If I ever see one, I will for sure spank his grey ass for the scares he did and for polluting earth with their wrecks.
1 Like
The reason why most aliens would never show themselves is because their DNA would smell different for humans. Animals with very sensitive olfactory nerves would readily pick up on the non-Earth smell and would sound the alarm for weeks at a time. Dog’s man’s best friend would hit on the non-Earth smell and alert their owners with non-stop barking.
Aliens would know that the smell they produce would be easily detected by Earth animals. After all if aliens were able to travel hundreds of thousands of light years to Earth, they would be advanced enough to understand natural olfactory senses.
Aliens would have to dress in full containment suits to keep their DNA smell from being detecting. Such suits would also draw attention to the aliens, after a while. There is no other way that aliens could mask their presence on Earth.
Remember in War of the Worlds when the aliens died because of the Common Cold? Virus and bacteria from Earth would also do in aliens who weren’t wearing any protective suits.
2 Likes
Kind of like saying our bacteria would eat alien DNA.
I know, I seen the movie!
You’re so close! You’re THIS close to get it right! Just replace “smell” with “vibrational frequency” and you’re technically correct.
Have you ever encountered a person irl that you felt overwhelmed by their presence? Not their smell but by them being there and you felt uneasy or on the opposite, very calm by their serenity? That’s vibrational frequency explained in the simplest terms, my friend!..Or any name you put on it.
1 Like
Vibrational frequencies have been used for many years by chemists to identify bonding arrangements in molecules . Each bond has its own frequency, so the vibrational spectrum yields information on the molecular structure.
Smell is the layman’s term.
Yes, molecular bonding of alien molecules would be different from humans. The closer to the sun that the alien home world was located in the habitable zone would cause molecular vibration to be slightly different, the same with an alien planet that was farther from the alien planets host star.
But, as long as the vibrational frequency allowed oxygen to be used as a fuel source, the aliens would be able to breathe on Earth. The aliens, however, would suffer severe cases of vertigo, improper balance, due to how the gravity of the Earth would effect the inner ear where balance takes place.
I can imagine an alien coming to Earth going to shake a world leaders hand and suddenly face planting itself into the ground.
World Leader: “Inner ear again?”
Alien: “Yep.”
World Leader: " I think Moderna has a pill for that."
Alien: “Nice, but what about my face?”
That might be possible. That would fall under the scientific method of having to prove such a thing.
Any belief (other than a belief in God, which is my opinion) must have evidence to support it otherwise it is classed as speculation and it will always be pointless to try and argue that evidence is not required.
Yes, based on the numbers of galaxies in the universe and the number of planets located within a goldilocks zone it’s quite possible there is (were) forms of life, but we must simply get onboard with the view that this is speculation based on facts and can never be considered fact until evidence is found and presented.
What about your belief that evidence is required? Does that belief need evidence, too?
The evidence is me, I just look in the mirror I am amazed at how I was created along with the reality around me. That is all the evidence I need.
I really don’t want to debate this if your view is to the contrary of mine. lets just say as far as we know, before there was nothing and now there is a massive universe, if we look carefully there is an architecture to everything, and wherever we see architecture there simply must be an architect.
To ask for evidence that God exists is silly in my opinion, mathematics and science are God’s languages which are apparent in everything.
Did living DNA just appear out of nowhere? there simply must be an origin for the DNA that drives life.
Let say I get a cut on my hand, my body seems to automatically send what it needs to the site of the cut and repair it. Again, in my opinion that is a form or programming where our bodies are on standby waiting for such events.
As I say I don’t want to debate this and I accept people will disagree with me, I’m not imposing this belief of mine either. feel free to ask questions if you seek to understand why I think this.
2 Likes
The sheer number of planets in the Universe is uncountable. To say that evidence is needed to prove life exists in the Universe when the number of planets is uncountable to beyond arrogance. It is totally childish. For those to say that life doesn’t exist in the Universe along with saying there must be proof is still a religious foundation of professing total knowledge based on not having any knowledge at all.
Another factor are people who have ‘degrees’ in one field and think that people should automatically consider the person with a degree an authority on everything. Basically, those who have ‘Generalist’ degrees are the worst scientists in the Universe.
Proof is not required for alien life to exist in the Universe. Math of probabilities does in fact prove life exists, elsewhere, other than Earth, in the Universe. If life on Earth is the only life that exists in the whole entire Universe, then life is a whole sh*ton of trouble, and that’s a proven fact.
How can those who say life doesn’t exist in the Universe even profess such a notion? Are scientists able to recreate the Universe using the process of the Big Bang to repeat and prove the Big Bang exists? Since science can’t recreate and test the Big Bang to prove that the Universe exists, then how do we exist?
No, it is your silly ad hominem that is childish. Science is not based on silly ad hominems or on what incredibly biased people ‘believe’. It is based on empirical evidence.
There is no empirical evidence for any life out there. None whatever. Zero. Zilch.
Let me know when you actually have some. Until such time, I really could not care less what you ‘believe’.
Lol…what a silly anti-authority load of nonsense.
Whom would I rather accept the views of…a professor in the actual field of research, who has spent years studying the subject, or the views of Joe The Burger Flipper posting on the internet ? Who is likely to know what they are talking about ? Huh ?
Alas Joe The Burger Flipper gets delusions of knowledge and ends up posting on forums alongside Mr Dunning and Mr Kruger.
I wanna be the minority
I don’t need your authority
Down with the moral majority
'Cause I wanna be the minority
I pledge allegiance to the underworld
One nation under dog, there of which I stand alone
A face in the crowd, unsung against the mold
Without a doubt, singled out, the only way I know
Altara Zemara - the Universe exists, Life exists in the Universe.
According to your Trek BBS Science/Technology plagerised response, the Universe itself cannot exist because in order for the Universe, science has to be able reproduce the exact same process that started the Big Bang with the same results, everytime, without deviation of the results.
Since science cannot reproduce the Big Bang and test the results for authenticity, then the Universe does not exist, based on scientific method. And therefore life on Earth does not exist.
Explain how humans and life exist on Earth when you cant even reproduce the Big Bang to prove the Universe exists.
Alien life exists in the Universe other than on Earth. Your attempts to make Earth the center of the Universe, rather yourself, in some scheme of reinging supreme based on the lack of knowledge is defitting someone who is trying to cancel.
You are not a scientist but are in fact a troll.
If you were a scientist, you wouldnt have any problem telling us your real name and where you science at so that the result of your authenticity can be proven.
You have found to be wanting.
Use the scientifice method to reproduce the Big Bang that will create the same results, results that will create another Earth with life on it. Then and only then can Earth be proven to have life on it.
No, the evidence that the universe exists is apparent for all to see. As it stands at the moment there is no evidence that can be believed beyond reasonable doubt to say that aliens exist. Any opinion or view anyone in the world has about aliens existing will be speculation until such proof is provided.
Without a universe there would be no oxygen for us to breathe and there would be no platform for any kind of life, I can see life around me so I do not accept your point as valid.
Also, if evidence of Aliens does exist then you and I would never ever see it, in fact it would be the absolute top priority to keep this evidence away from normal folks like you and I, we would probably “disappear” if we did see it. If there is evidence that we don’t know of then it’s probably best to keep it that way as I personally don’t think we are ready to find out such info.
1 Like
What the…
If you cannot see just what a false dilemma ( your speciality when it comes to logical fallacies ) that is, then you are truly clueless.
All I see in your posts is classic Dunning Kruger. Someone who grasps so little that they are simply incapable of grasping how little they grasp.