They claim they own their own stuff, the EULA only grants you permission to use an account they let you create, as a user you legally own nothing and they aren’t required to let you keep accessing it
Even if they hypothetically ruled you had to split the assets they have no real world value so you need to give them exactly $0 worth of assets
your first mistake and last mistake
Hahahahaha!!! Thank you for that!
My ibis is property of CCP
You really should get Babatunde B Babatunde - Attorney at law on the case
naaaaa
go for the best ones
in no particular order
harvey specter
harvey birdman
johnnie"chewbacca defense" cochran
saul goodman
or phoenix wright OFC
Don’t forget Saul!
omg yeah
sry
fixed
I’m sure Princess Aiko has a service like this already.
Aiko IS the ex-wife.
No.
This is not a simple matter of a EULA, or the business of a company, being inferior to a court decision in some foreign country. The business is entitled to specify the terms of the business (product). The customer agrees with those terms. That agreement is binding. If a business sells only cows, a judge ruling it’s dogs as well is a fool unless he has proof that goes beyond “I consider them all animals hence the company sells animals, this court rules that they will refund the cow because it doesn’t bark nor guards the house”.
CCP is not part of the gambling industry, there are no payouts.
An asset does not have to be saleable to have a monetary value (check your own legal jurisdiction for clarification). It is entirely feasible to value an asset using a “replacement cost” method or a “use of” method.
If a court rules that you have an asset and that asset’s value then in the eyes of the law, you have that asset. This is not in conflict with CCP, the EULA or any binding agreements an individual has with a company.
[ own opinion / not a lawyer etc ]
Saying you have an in game-asset is one thing, saying that the virtual asset is part of the community (marriage) “value” is very different, attaching a monetary value to an EvE asset is plain wrong and should be opposed. Try to get the monetary value out, that’s the litmus test. That would also suggest that if the claimant had any hobbies of his/her own half of the “value” of the “assets” there could be claimed in response. Or why divorces get messy, mostly from poor judging.
let this post die, it is dumb
Buy subscriptions for space money wait for receiver pay out on unfulfilled subscription, get paid out.
Also the entire RMT industry would disagree, they make their livelyhoods from $ cash outs in Eve.
At least make it look like you’re joking.
I thought that was implicit in every post
Great 
. That means we can keep it open and add a bit more fun. It’s better than the average whine thread, isn’t it.
No, its really stupid and crass.
At least I can vent at the whine threads. This is just… nothing to do with EvE.
RMT = Drug dealing apparently, won’t someone think of the children?
RMT is not a crime, nor is it immoral. Imagine Ford saying you were not allowed to sell 2nd hand cars because 2nd hand cars damage the car manufacturers sales of new cars. Then they tried to justify it by saying well some 2nd hand cars are stolen. That is CCP’'s position on RMT.
So throw a pennt to your Corp rmt’r.
Also plenty of druglord kingpins have had their dealing obtained wealth & assets halved in divorce’s.