Does anyone actually believe this?

This is a carry on thread from a locked thread, which they got locked with personal attacks.

I am not declaring a win, in that thread I was suggesting a change from 100% mining drone yield to 120% because I was finding that my Skiff with a T1 strip miner and single T2 mining upgrade was out mining my Orca by what I thought was too great a margin. I did not detail my fit and training level from the start and I did not make a precise statement in terms of crystals for example which enabled the ganker to go for a win by opening tis thread. If you look above I state that if you go all out in terms of crystals then I am wrong. But in terms of what I was looking at I was correct.

So using the statement of a win is what these ganker flunkies are at not me, because it is all about personal attacks to discredit me. And I made it easier by not being precise from the start. So what!

That is a rather stupid statement, where have I done any statistical analysis here, I have not used a spreadsheet and done any such thing, my yield comment was based on observing what the difference was in terms of m3 and my comment about Orca ganks being mainly in the pipes was based on previous observation of Orca’s losses.

So to say I have no understanding of statistics is a bit odd when I have not done any statistical analysis at all.

My observation of Orca ganks in hisec was at around 80% as a view, and 99.99% was a joke, however since mid-January one of the most prolific gankers in hisec a certain Australian Excellence seems to be taking a break from the game. If you look at the late December and early January period you can see quite a few ganks in the pipes, but then it falls right off. As there are only really two to three very active freighter gankers and that he was always the most active. That has a significant impact and if you would be honest you would understand why my previous observation is incorrect if people look only at recent losses.

That is an irrelevant statement because in terms of medicine and food even one case of sickness or unexpected side effects can result in a recall. Also note that with the batch system they can be very effective in recalling defective products. The use of horse meat in beef products in Europe a couple of years ago showed how easily corrupt people could get around the system of ticking the boxes with no active verification in terms of ingredients and their mislabelling.

Over to you …