To the contrary, the other thread in question is comprised of everyone poking holes at your proposal, which is categorically inferior to the status quo in each and every single conceivable fashion. This is not an insult, this is objective truth.
In response to the community’s peer review process repeatedly invalidating your idea on multiple fronts, your behavior has been accurately described as follows:
Indeed! Here you are talking behind our backs - yet another bout of unwarranted personal attacks, of which there have been many directed at the most level-headed and nicest of the forum regulars. It’s interesting that so much effort is expended making insults and shaming others (bringing up topic-irrelevant killboards in an alt-centric game to “shame” their non-PVP characters, for example) and accusing them of logical fallacies and violating rules of argumentation when they are not (though several examples exist in which you are - and they have been called out as such) instead of addressing the concerns raised by others. I do not know why you are accusing others of doing what you doing orders of magnitude both more often and purposefully. (Evidence of the preceding claims is ample through the other thread.)
I already said this in the other thread and I’m going to say it again:
Be the better man that you claim to be and hold yourself up to the same standings you repeatedly expect of others: stop making personal attacks even if you perceive personal attacks being levied onto you. (Note: harsh criticism of your idea on objective grounds is not the same thing as a personal attack.)
As for this proposal… just like the other one, this proposal:
- does not address a need
- does not enhance the game
- introduces unnecessary complexity
- makes the game less enjoyable
- is categorically inferior to the status quo
- that the idea is “interesting” does not merit serious consideration any more than putting propellers on a lunchbox does.
(The other proposal had additional faults.)
All of the above truths are self-evident to any knowledgeable and experienced EVE player. (I should point out that, as a rule of thumb, newbies, particularly those which admit themselves to be such, have no business making game wrecking suggestions when they do not understand or appreciate the implications of such changes, their consequences, or in this case lack of benefits.)
I further point out that just because it would technically “work” (quantitatively ) doesn’t mean it would work well regarding game balance or be enjoyable for the game (qualitatively). I’ve said that in the other thread and I’ll say it here yet again.