/dons MAGA hat.
Communism !!!
To be fair, the forums is the minority.
I think he is, totally ignoring the existence of very successful pvp games. Of course, they are ‘different’ and don’t count.
1 Like
Meh, I don’t think he even understands the concept of a niche product, or how it can be successful without appealing to mass consumerism.
Yes i’m claiming that eve has to obey to the reality of the market in order to survive…the evidence(player loss) is clear you just don’t want to see it…
If not…well may the last turn off the lights…
People have been saying this since 2003, it was a lie then, and it’s a lie now.
In short, you tell lies in order to further your own agenda.
Liar.
Nice…
And the player loss does not exist so that nothing has changed since 2003 is that right…?
Well then…something must have changend because the player loss is real and beside those shiny monthly reports that still state an average of 35 k everytime i check(and this is daily) it’s around or slightly above 20k so to reach the 35k average it must be 50k at us primetime right?
So WHO is the liar here…
What’s the matter?
Don’t you like to be held to the same standards that you hold others to?
And the player loss does not exist so that nothing has changed since 2003 is that right…?
Nobody is saying this, you’re just assuming that we’re saying this because you can’'t read beyond the end of your interests.
Well then…something must have changend because the player loss is real and beside those shiny monthly reports that still state an average of 35 k everytime i check(and this is daily) it’s around or slightly above 20k so to reach the 35k average it must be 50k at us primetime right?
CCP are lying, so is Chribba and so is the API, is that what you’re suggesting? Furthermore you might want to learn how averages work.
So WHO is the liar here…
I’ll leave that to the readers imagination, although the obvious culprit here is the person with an agenda of turning Eve into everything it is not.
So the average of 20k at europe prime and 20k at us prime is 35k?
20 + 20 = 40/2 is 35?
20 + 50 = 70/2 is NOT 35?
This is interesting…
Another contextless post does nothing to further your claim.
If you’re going to dispute the numbers, you should provide the numbers that you’re basing your argument on.
Until then learn about how averages work and…
Shut up Balos
1 Like
And here we go with the weaponised flagging because I dared to ask for the numbers that your claim is based on, and god forbid that I suggest that it is based on anecdotal evidence at best, an outright lie at worst.
Grow up and stop acting like a petulant child that has just been caught in a lie.
Oh wait…
1 Like
No it’s because of the shut up balos insult…quit this and nothing will be flagged…
Flagging it again once it’s been unhidden isn’t a good idea; it was unhidden a while back by an ISD I presume.
1 Like
Tasting your own medicine feels not as good as you thought eh?
This happened to me on a regular base so stop whining and simply delete the shut up balos part…
Halt’s Maul Balos. Better? 
1 Like
I have never knowingly reflagged a post that I have previously flagged after it has been deemed to be ok by a member of the ISD team.
This happened to me on a regular base so stop whining
Have you ever considered that people might actually find your posting style to be unnecessarily aggressive and rude?
Might this explain why your posts get flagged?
Or is it all a huge conspiracy to mute the most childish and arrogant person in the room, you?
One is far more likely than the other, we have better things to do with our time than take part in the latter; you get flagged a lot because you’re rude.
You provide questionable arguments to further an agenda that many of us consider to be a huge risk for CCP, not least because changing a core fundamental of a game to satisfy “the market” has been tried before, overall the results aren’t encouraging.
You’re aggressive in your replies to others, you dismiss actual numbers and reliable data as fiction while refusing to provide your own sources; and you’re rude about it.
That’s all before we get into some of the more questionable stuff that you’ve posted in the past with other characters.
Your biggest problem, is you.
and simply delete the shut up balos part…
Ok, shut up Ari, Traco, Hysan, Duro. Another couple and it’ll be like the 7 dwarfs, only less funny. How many have you biomassed and exploited that you can still post on the forums, and do so without repercussion in game; which IMHO shouldn’t be possible.
TL:DR in answer to “shut up”
2 Likes
The sad part is that you really don’t seem to see this as a problem…
I very much do see a problem here, you’ve exploited the fact that you can post on the forums with a biomassed character, to promote an agenda that could be seen as troll like given the nature of Eve, at least twice that I know of.
You shouldn’t be able to do that, and pointing out that you do this is not the problem.
If you’re referring to the “controversial” shut up meme.
If you’re going to act like an arrogant, uninformed, ill mannered, ignorant and childish person, we’re going to treat you like one.
You, and you alone, are entirely responsible for 99.99% of the hostility that you get from others.
If you don’t keep your ego in check, we’ll keep trying to cut your head off.
3 Likes
False legend building is part of the problem you and your kind have…beside your certainities of course…
You and only you KNOW how this game has to be played and EVERYONE that has another opinion is the enemy…
So YOU and your comrades are the agressor here and not me…
The sad part here is you don’t even see it becaus it cannot be…so i must be wrong…
Certainities as i said…
All you say and ever have said is a whole new level of irrelevant.so no wonder you have to jump on marginal things in order to devalue my point…
Nice if someone gives his opponent the munition it needs for free…
And now i’m off for the day so don’t expect any answers .
Change your script then. Your previous incarnations are but a google search away.
Occam’s Razor applies here.
Which is more likely?
A person creates alts simply for the purposes of promoting an agenda they know many will find controversial, but because they’re not that imaginative they continue to use almost exactly the the same phrasing and format for each alt when they do it…
There’s several people all around the world that coincidentally share the same controversial agenda, and use almost the exact same phrasing and format when they post on the forums…
The less we have to assume, the more likely it is to be close to the truth.
Projection much?
We know what is, and we have very strong opinions on what should not be, you have a very strong opinion about it too; our opinions clash with yours.
The difference between what we think, and what you think is that we can provide sources for anything that requires facts and figures.
Our opinions are informed and have some weight behind them by dint of sources/evidence being available for review. You’ve chosen to dismiss that when presented with it in the past, everything after that is on you.
You appear to have nothing beyond, well some vague marketing mumbo jumbo and a massive void where coherent thought and evidence to support your claims should be.
“The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness.” ~ Pierre-Simon Laplace.