Come now, Io. Retreating into vague allusions when your argument is called into question is pretty low-rent. In the other thread, you said:
and I re-phrased that as:
That’s a pretty clear paraphrase and doesn’t impute anything you didn’t directly imply. (And if you’ve found any ‘insults’ in my recent replies, that’s news to me.)
And to argue so strongly against the validity of a guy who did a pretty fair job analyzing his own stats and doing what research he was able, and then make baldly unsupported statements like:
only means you’re very comfortable holding viewpoints you disagree with to a completely different standard than your own.
You’re a good debater, overall, and more intellectually honest than 95% on these forums. But you’ve still got clear bias and are quite willing to bend the argument in it’s favor.
A cleverly worded argument that doesn’t do the game any good, is just as bad as bad-faith or ‘fallacious’ arguments that do the same.