You did not come up with the line.
It matters, because you claimed they are hard, when they in fact are not.
You WERE wrong on that, and clearly uneducated on the distinction.
You did not come up with the line.
It matters, because you claimed they are hard, when they in fact are not.
You WERE wrong on that, and clearly uneducated on the distinction.
I refuse to talk to a child that is fixated on an irrelevant detail ignoring what matters. If you are so extremely requiring to be told that you are right, then by all means:
You are right. Go make a video about it.
There. You were wrong.
That wasn’t so hard, was it.
You are very welcome. Whatever makes you shut up and feel better is good on my books.
I didn’t thank you for anything, but you did the right thing at last, for yourself.
As you can tell, it didn’t make me shutup, nor do I feel any better.
The good in the books, is that you owned your mistakes and learned something new today!
Well done!
Here, have a Gold Star!
Sorry, I’m confused - what do you mean by “forgot to get a new clone got shot up and lost years of skill points” ? I though that getting killed always meant being reborn in your medical clone with all your skills intact (except neural implants and a few tech 3 skills). Is this not the case ? Do you have to create a new medical clone after being reborn and, if so, how do you go about doing it ?
Now, yes.
It was not always that way.
Loooooollllllll
EVE has turned from here’s a ship, f you to here’s a ship, some food, some books, some surprises in boxes, f you*
It got dumbed down massively since I started playing, all of that because people thought it was too complicated…
Just glad warp mechanics haven’t changed in so long
Funny how @Wavemistress_Moidel and @Solstice_Projekt considered that “dumbing down” EVE.
Id love to see the faces on suicide gankers, nullbears etc when they lose all their SP on blowing up, if that was ever “de-dumbed down”.
I dont think you understand what “dumbing down” means.
EVE is more complicated and difficult to learn now, than ever before.
Waves hand. Mechanics, everywhere!
Mechanics haven’t changed in many years for a lot of them, and most that changed are stupidly simple lol
EVE is hard for you because you don’t do research about basic stuff then complain it’s super hard…
It’s not like all the mechanics’ information is not readily available on the internet lmao
EVE is more complicated and difficult to learn than ever before.
Just about every patch/change brings more mechanics, changes to previous ones, to the system.
If anything, the learning curve is steeper now than ever before.
So much didn’t exist back then, that exists now.
EVE has not been “dumbed down”.
Quite the opposite.
What game have you played other than EVE Forums Online?
I mean, you’re in no way a reference… you didn’t know anything about warping mechanics lmao
Dom stats:
704 topics viewed
25.5k posts read
2.4k given
15 topics created
1.3k posts created
1.2k received
Salvos stats:
623 topics viewed
27.8k posts read
562 given
4 topics created
3.6k posts created
1.8k received
Your lack of introspection is truly remarkable.
PS: It literally says this in your profile:
“I’m Dom, I terrorize the forum with my shiptoasts.”
And this.
Look who you focus on:
Now compare that to mine:
Dom. He is right.
Tell him.
Dom has posted to me TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY TIMES (260)!
I’m first on his list, BY FAR.
The next is Drac at a mere 78, and Yellow after at an even lower 23.
63% of Doms posts in his top 6, have been to me.
He has posted to me more times than the other 5 COMBINED.
This isn’t even including posts directed at me, in which he did not mention me by registered name, which probably adds about 100 posts more.
This even after I deliberately ignored his posts for the last 2 weeks or so.
I knew something stank here.
Now compare that to my posting list.
This, when Dom has openly, publicly stated he hates me.
Sorry
But no
Your argument is invalid mate
Go on. Cry wolf to CCP like holey did.
If you took the I hate you personally that’s your problem, not mine
And to be clear
Most of these posts were informative.
As proven by the many war and bumping threads where you kept spamming your nonsense lol
Well…
Economics and other financial sciences might be hard for some people to grasp, but they’re not considered hard sciences. Hard sciences are generally the natural sciences, while the social sciences are considered soft sciences.
The key is in the amount of objectivity found in pursuit of facts. In the hard sciences you can generally create and monitor true experiments, whereas there is less ability to do so in the social sciences due to ethics and subjectivity.
Ethics is important because while it might be an interesting to statistically see how many newborns might be successfully raised by wolves - no one in their right mind would be able to actually run the experiment needed. So instead social science has to rely on other methods of study such as quasi experiments or natural experiments (things that happen by chance, but researchers will take every effort to study - like a market crash).
Subjectivity is the other difference between the two categories. While an atom or a cell will generally operate in a manner that is observable and measurable, humans actions generally don’t. Just look at what people use for ‘evidence’ here in the forums. Humans lie to save face, often confuse opinions for facts, and have fallible memories.
In one study in Arizona, researchers asked neighborhood residents individually how much they drank on a weekly basis. The answers were recorded, then a few months later, they received permission from the local government to go through the trash cans on the curb (which made the trash now property of the city).
The findings did not match up to what people said, and they later followed up with the residents, again individually. The responses were mostly given to save face, a few were “it was just a guess”, and a few lied because they didn’t drink and didn’t want to seem ‘weird’.
This was with trash and involved some legal finesse to get this accomplished. Try doing something like this with politics or economics. Researchers are almost always stuck with asking those being studied, because some actions cannot be observed.
–Social Gadget
Gadget… What. Does. This. Change. About. The. Hundreds. Of. Billions. Pushed. Into. Scientific. Research.
Nothing. Absolutely nothing. How can you waste so much time on a post that completely ignores what matters. Is he contagious?
Citation is required. You claim these are facts, prove it. Where is your evidence?