Could do better.
Low effort, but still boosting the post count. That was post 601.
Seriously though, you claim to love high sec, but you don’t have a permit. That’s a real problem for those of us who live in high sec.
Then vote for someone else.
Your #1 campaign promise is to allow miners a 50% chance to escape justice. Does this imply that all ganks will also have a 50% chance of success? So we can basically do a coin flip before each gank and see who wins?
1 Like
Not even elected to the CSM and already ignoring the people she claims to love.
No it isnt. The number 1 on my list is something else. (scroll up).
The 50% thing was number 2 on my list… and I already stated that the list was even not in order.
And it is not a “campaign promise”.
No. The 50% thing has been discussed since the CSM X elections. Also up above. No need to start the entire thread again… we are already 600 posts in.
Ignoring who?
Your blog has nothing other than a repeat of what you initially posted here.
Isn’t it true that your entire campaign boils down to the completely absurd statement that you “would like at least a 50% chance of walking away from a gank.” Do you bring anything to the table other than this statement?
1 Like
This thread seems to be mostly about that, because people keep posting about that.
There are other points in my opening post here…
1 Like
You sure about that?
Very, I wrote it after all.
If you were to ask about other stuff… there would be answers.
Nope, looks like you didn’t have any other ideas, well except for moving the ice fields about for some reason, but beyond that your post is literally empty.
You could have been more concise and just said “Vote for me! Gankers should fail 50% of the time! Also the ice fields should move about.” Great plan.
Have you ever actually talked to anyone in high sec and asked what they want? Do you even know what people in high sec want? Or is this just a pure vanity campaign?
Ok, let’s explore this idea further though. So 50% is fair, if its even for both sides, right? So if I gank someone, and I get CONCORDed, there should be a 50% chance that CONCORD will then attack them as well? So 50% chance of failure, but 50% chance of success - that’s only fair, right?
Obvious troll is obvious troll. There is a lot more there.
It’s like you have not even read the post… just imagine.
Yes. For example in the past election threads. There was even some interesting talk with Gankers, like Admiral Root. In the past the discussion was interesting and I learned stuff from it.
But they don’t make you guys like they used to.
I mean, so right now, when I am specifically asking you - you can’t state any ideas that you have? Not even one little idea?
1 Like
No.
This has been done a lot before.
If you want to explore the idea, then at least read what has already be said, by other people and by me. There are now 5 years of CSM campaigning about it, with discussions in all sorts of directions.
There is no need to be going on with short posts and one liners that have no relevance to how the idea has been developed over the years.
I posted several in the opening post.
So no, you are campaigning on no ideas whatsoever, other than the idea that ganking should have a 50% fail rate, and the ice fields should move about.
You can’t expect me to research years of forum posts in order to figure out what other inane ideas you’ve had.
1 Like
Firstly, the other ideas I have had are all in the opening post up there, there are other sections than the “ganking” one.
Secondly,: you can’t expect me to take you seriously if you come here and are not even prepared to read the discussions that have already taken place above… without even having to click on other posts. We are over 600 posts into this thread… and you are just starting at the beginning.
Not cool.
What’s not cool is you can’t state ONE idea - when specifically asked what ideas you have, you literally can’t come up with one.
1 Like