High Sec Candidate

I stated several, all in the opening post of this thread.

Yes, but you didn’t, and now that you are being asked, you refer back to some previous document… because you literally have nothing.

I mean, how hard is it? You want to be on the CSM - so what are your ideas?

Come on, you must have some ideas!

No, I refer to the opening post of this thread, which you have not read.

I’ve read it, I saw the following ideas:

  1. ganks fail 50% of the time

  2. ice belts move about

What other ideas do you have to ‘improve’ high sec?

Several.
They are all up there.

There are also several, to improve EVE.

Here, since you are pretending to have ideas, let me show you a specific example.

You said, “War Declarations: This is a work in progress for CCP, and I must say, that I am glad they finally got around to it. Since they started the changes I have been involved in war in high sec (both on the receiving and the giving end). Although I find it more interesting than before, it still needs a lot of work. This is also tied up with things like the Citadel invulnerability mechanics.”

Please, where is your idea? Once we remove all the excess words from your post, where do you actually have any ideas at all?

Selective quoting my opening post?

You said: “I would like to clarify, I am not in favour of stopping ganking completely. I am not in favour of just AFK mining the whole day. EVE is what it is, and the game developers have been quite clear over the years where they stand on this issue.”

I’m sorry, do you have any ideas there, or are you just typing words without actually saying anything at all?

Selective quoting my opening post?

Yes, I’m quoting your original post, which is utterly devoid of any ideas or suggestions to improve the game. You don’t even have bad ideas, there’s just nothing there at all.

Your post is literally BLABLABLA im a carebear blablablabla ive played EVE for a while BLABLABLA many people have many ideas about many things and i think this all raises a lot of ideas BLABLABLABLA but i dont actually have ideas of my own.

1 Like

Really?

Well, you tell me! You are the one running for CSM.

What specifically are the ideas you have? Just list them right here, you can even cut and paste them from somewhere, since you insist you wrote them elsewhere.

And another issue, why would the CSM need to have ideas of their own?

1 Like

Well, since you aren’t representing the ideas of the community, you’d damn well better have some ideas of your own. Otherwise, why are you running for CSM?

Is this just a vanity campaign?

1 Like

It’s nice to have gankers coming out in support of more random CONCORD times.

We’ve always supported more random CONCORD times - response in 5-15 minutes.

1 Like

There is a whole bunch of posts up above with gankers and anti-gankers not supporting random CONCORD times.

It’s very hard to take any kind of discussion with anyone seriously… who has not taken the trouble to inform themselves about the discussion they are trying to join.

Well, isn’t it your job to inform people why you should be on the CSM?

I’m asking you straight up - what are your ideas?

Well?

I have.

They are covered in the original post.
There has also been some expansion on them in the 600 posts afterwards.

If you obviously are not prepared to read the conversations that have already happened, then I am not prepared to answer questions that have already been answered. More than once.

Ok, then you clearly should not be on the CSM. Thank you for applying.