but its easier to leave that out of the quote than try to defend that point
Funny, because you did. Once again, words mean things.
Please fix your quote. 
Let me re-quote yourself for you:
To which I said
To which you responded
To summarize:
If you can’t field what is needed (in low/null) (i.e. caps), you’re screwed in highsec.
- The relevancy of capitals in this situation is erroneous anyway.
- I can’t fly a single capital ship (yet, mind you), yet I am 100% certain that I can adequately defend something in HS.
1 Like
I was attempting to quote you quoting me. It doesn’t matter that much. Anyone with an extra 20 seconds of time can see that I am correct.
1 Like
I’ll just say this
For people that never leave HS, moon mining is literal gold for them currently.
If you limit the number of capable moons and give better ores (low tier nullsec equivalent), they will fight for the control of those.
Nullsec/Lowsec groups won’t care since they already have R32s and R64s
If you think it will kill content, fine, it’s your opinion. But it doesn’t change the fact that it will bring a lot of long-term content for most highsec denizens.
I’m out for a couple of hours 
if you have a structure worth taking by a group that can <--------------------------- is a very important part.
if group A
can field 19b worth of ships with 34 pilots over a one month period
and group B
can field 3b worth of ships with 15 pilots
group B is going to lose no matter what the sec status of the space is.
yes capitals are irrelevant i have been a part of POS sieges in LS and NS that also didn’t utilize caps. i have been involved in ones where only one side had caps
its about how much you can field for how long while inflicting damage unsustainable to the other side
Null sec and low sec groups will care because if they can limit the sustainability of highsec more, they - especially null sec - can sell their oversupplies of ores and minerals for more profit.
And that single mining citadel would be under wardec and attack 23/7 non-stop. No mining would get done. Ever.
no it wouldn’t once some one big enough to make taking it not worth it there would hardly be any fighting on it at all
That’s just your opinion mate
I don’t know one group who’d be willing to weaken themselves in null or low only to have few shitty moons in highsec
Even merc groups have better things to do than to protect citadels (they can’t even protect their own pocos lul)
… if its not worth it for the null group to take it then there will still be a group large enough to make it not worth taking and then it will just sit there uncontested.
currently they are being blown up so conflict is already being generated around them
They’re not being blown up.for the resources like I mentioned above.
They’re being blown for fun like any other structures sitting in hs
but they are being blown up and thus generating conflict.
Still not for resources
Still not by pve corps
Your argument is invalid
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.