Itaer for CSM 20

Hello everyone, I’m Itaer and I’m running for CSM 20. I’ve been playing Eve since 2007, through many different play styles in many different areas of space. My main interest has always been small gang PvP. I have spent an extensive amount of time in lowsec space, mainly in the caldari-gallente warzone. Currently, I live in wormhole space and am very interested in the PvP interface between kspace and wormhole space. In real life, I am a scientist (ask me about comets!) with significant experience in data science, and I hope to bring that perspective to my discussions with CCP.

There are three main things that I would like to focus on as one of your CSM representatives:

  1. Communication: Since I ran for CSM 19 last year, I feel that CCP has improved their communication with the community dramatically. CCP has opened a number of new community engagement channels, like the new podcast-style dev chats, CCP Okami giving frequent updates and discussion on discord, and more in depth justification for changes as seen in the Legion major update patch notes. This is a super positive direction, and I have heard from many CSM members that CCP has been very responsive to the CSM this year, and that a lot of these changes came about in cooperation with the CSM. This kind of communication is very important to me. My own personal conversations with CCP k1p1 and several CSM members, both at fanfest and online, led directly to the skyhook raiding changes earlier this year, as mentioned in Drake Iddon for CSM20 - Inflict me upon the devs for another year. I want to help CCP continue in this direction by supporting their communication with the community.

    TL;DR CCP has been doing a much better job of communicating this year. We need a CSM that encourages that to continue. I have talked to CCP quite a bit this year, and I want to continue that relationship.

  2. Iteration: As a long time Eve player, the lack of consistent iteration has long been the most frustrating part of CCP’s development style. There is an old player joke that “the ‘I’ in CCP stands for iteration”, and for good reason. Eve is a graveyard of half-finished ideas. Tiericide, proving grounds, incursions, the Drifter storyline, and many more. If there is any one thing that I would actually like to *change* as a CSM member, this is it. Even the most exciting new feature needs attention as the game ages.

    While CCP has improved on this as well, I think that far more work needs to be done here. There is a massive amount of untapped potential in the game. Players are already very familiar with existing systems; improving them is highly appreciated. It is impossible for any team of developers to match the creativity and insight of the entire Eve community. Once a change is made or a feature added to the game, it is nearly guaranteed that the community will spot things that CCP did not - things to be changed, things which could be done better, and things which can be expanded. Once all the work has been done to build, polish, and release a feature, iterating with community feedback is high reward for low effort. It is okay to make changes. In a game like Eve, stagnation is death. Please continue to change things.

    TL;DR I’d really like to push for more consistent iteration across older systems, to revisit things which have aged, and for a commitment to continuing iteration for new features.

  3. The little things: CCP Karkur’s little things thread has been one of the most successful community-facing development conversations in the history of Eve. I want to make sure that CCP continues this as an ongoing commitment. CCP needs to hear that spending developer time on these things is important and appreciated. Let’s iterate on bookmark folder limits. Let’s add notes to ships in hangars. Let’s tie ACLs to corp roles. Let’s iterate on the skill extraction UI. Maybe we should consider expanding this effort to include a community polling system - something that may not be suited for balance changes, but could be super impactful when it comes to prioritizing which quality of life changes see dev time. More than anything, let’s hear a commitment to this. Let us hear that this is understood as important.

    TL;DR I want to see CCP make a commitment to expanding and continuing the focus on “the little things”, and to improving quality of life.

I appreciated the outpouring of support last year, and I look forward to representing the smallgang community on the CSM this year. In the last year I have really appreciated talking with current CSM candidates @Drake_Iddon and @youngpuke2. Thanks for reading!

4 Likes

Itaer is an extremely skilled pilot in the game but backs it up by having a logical approach to problem solving when under restriction (which is vital for the CSM, who operate under limits to thier own communication due to NDA, time limits due to the nature of the CSM elections, and any limits on dev time and scope that they will find themselves in at various stages of the game’s update cycle)

I sat down with Itaer at fanfest to talk about an area of space that he enjoys, Skyhook raiding, and the issues that stemmed from its very one sided implementation in Equinox, and the (then) ongoing issues that stemmed from the massive overcorrection to its original implementation

He eloquently defined the problem space, its effect on player engagement, considered the potential opposing opinions to his frame of mind, and also suggested potential avenues to address the issues

With this information I was able to discuss this under the NDA directly with senior CCP staff and ultimately many of his suggested ideas got into the game and were recieved well

10/10 very wholesome boi absolutlely deserves a spot on your ballot

2 Likes

Me and Itaer spoke 100 times about things that could’ve been different in EVE and without a doubt Itaer does not just spit things randomly but it is always a well thought through ideas.

Itaer is also a wormholler like me and I would love to see more changes to WH space as I think WH space is least updated at the moment.

I also know Itaer as a friend and he is definitely a reliable human being, I would love him to be on board in CSM as I’m certain that he would at least listen to player feedback and deliver it to CCP.

1 Like

Anyone that has ever had a discussion with Itaer about EVE can tell you he has a deep understanding of many aspects of the game and palpable passion for seeing the EVE universe grow and improve.

In the time I have known him, we have had multiple hours long discussions on a wide variety of topics ranging from new player retention, to small gang PvP, to the identity of wormhole space and how it could be deepened and crystalized into a thriving region of space. Each time it always stuck with me exactly how much care and attention he had put into each topic, and it was clear he had considered them from many points of view.

I know im not someone that anyone would recognize, but consider mine the voice of an average player in EVE when i say that I really think Itaer would strive to improve the EVE universe for all. Many voted to CSM in the past represent one group or region of space and promote the interests of that bloc, I believe Itaer would a true representative for the health and growth of the game for all.

1 Like

I don’t think I’ve ever met a bloke that’s as passionate for Eve as Itaer is, and I’ve got no doubt in my mind that he’d be a brilliant advocate for us players on the CSM.

Solid fellow with an understanding of EVE that covers everything from how to break minds transversal matching in pvp to sourcing rare lore items that haven’t been on the market for over a decade.

Can’t think of a better candidate for CSM - missing by such a narrow margin last year further supports that. Got my vote!