Let’s talk about suspect flags for T4/5

[Ramona_McCandless]

I think being able to gank them is sufficient penalty for them daring to engage in this trite content.

[Onictus]

@Haulie_Berry

Which doesn’t actually change any of the calculus on, “Highsec even with a suspect timer is still a lot safer, especially without local in null.”

Not even close.

[Haulie_Berry]

@Janus_Gregorian

You have to understand: Anderson isn’t interested in a proper discussion or comparable risk/reward. He just wants to protect his T5 income and will use any and all silly logic to accomplish that, or at the very least change the subject.

I actually think the suspect flag would make the income a lot better.

If you’re not a paste-eating numpty it doesn’t move the needle on the actual risk, but it intimidates the paste-eating numpties out of the market.

[Janus_Gregorian]

For the people willing and capable to put in that effort, yes. But that counts out most carebears/PVers, obviously. Still, it’s one reason I’m not necessarily seeing it as the solution.

[Onictus]

@Janus_Gregorian

It doesn’t, not necessarily anyway. What matters is that right now the risk/reward for these things is out of line compared to other high sec option.

Funny I can run level 4s at 200m/hr
or Incursions @ 150mil/hr
T4/T5s run in the that range…and being at the mercy of CCPs servers and netcode is significantly more risky than either of the above.

In 3 years running incursions I have never lost a ship. Can’t say that for burners or T4s.