it’s only hard due to you being a very bad player. It was literally no effort for people above 40 IQ and at least a bit of understanding how pve works, with you lacking both of those.
1 Like
You need to quote the whole line not part of it 
hint otherwise it changes what people say.
You cheeky bugger.
You are complaining the most in this thread: you must be the worst at this game by your own definition.
2 Likes
I am not the one complaining it’s hard to do something trivial.
I’m complaining about how safe it makes nullsec for a certain playstyle which was already 99% safe.
You complain a lot and acuse everyone of having a low ip of under 100 xD It makes me think you are trying to a compensate for your very avg 100 IQ lol.
Hint, you need punctuation if you want to be understood correctly, in hindsight I see your post can be read in another way, but there’s no punctuation to discern which was the correct reading.
“no one told them this is the new nullsec now, you have to stay in it even if you don’t like it.”
vs
“no one told them this is the new nullsec, now you have to stay in it even if you don’t like it.”
It’s your fault for being ambiguous.
That’s because none of those are correct :], a comma would only cause confusion. Its’ a single flowing sentence, otherwise it changes the meaning.
- z0r -
The single flowing sentence in this case is grammatically incorrect, and thus formally has no or undefined meaning.
Just look at all that null nearby us too…
null security means no security?
Just come back to high sec, and we will teach you how to play the game.
2 Likes
Apparently it means carebear farming paradise 
2 Likes
Wrong … it means ist the only Player driven security in eve and that is being made utterly useless for what ? Eve was announced to me as “Player driven Content” … well sofar I have expierienced that only in NS … we don’t have indestructable NPC-Stations here to dock to if the ■■■■ hits the fan, we don’t have Concord here to help me out (when I am already dead … stupid design) and we have basically no security except that what we can provide ourself. If that is taken away from us in favor for some ganktards .. well .. not my game anymore. If I wanted much pvp … I Play WoT, if I wanted no local I would live in WH. Since I have the choice … no more Money for stupidity. NS with (untrackable) Drifter BS Fleets and now 100% safe gangtards I won’t Sub anymore … and will see whether I come back or not. That is real Democracy and I vote against the changes.
And anyone wanting my stuff … you get the isk .. as Bounty on your head .. no more ^^
1 Like
Are you saying that gangtards don’t provide you with player driven content?
I’m sorry that you are not ready for this challenge, just come back to high sec and let’s focus on teaching you how to play the game. Perhaps EVE University is a good place for you to practice. Also, can I have your stuff? You don’t know what to do with it, so I’ll put it to good use.
Weren’t you not that stupiud ■■■■■ trying to catch me with a bunch of Sabres ? I laughed so hard … no, since you cannot even set up a proper gate camp … LTF … learn to fly …
1 Like
goodbye EVE ! I will not renew my subscription which ends in August, and will not return until all this nonsense stops including Drifters and ending with blackouts. I hope that the leadership of the CCP will find the strength to reason.
1 Like
Bye! \o
I do. 100% safe ganks and gtfo are zero content-wise. They are only happening because how risk-free it is, no need to engage response, and like many ganktards specified in this case, they won’t even engage if there’s a fleet in system or neighboring system, or there’s a single trap on killboard free intel - meaning they are explicitly against any sort of pvp content.
1 Like
PSA - you can make a support ticket to pause your subscription for the duration of this nonsense - you’ll get alphaed once your ticket is responded to, and the remaining days will be stored until you’d like them back.
i spilled my coffee reading this 
love it