Classical Dunning-Kruger, always entertaining.
2 Likes
yesā¦
taunting one that you know of is right with every word he says but not accepting the reality and therefore trying to twist his words until you find a grip to attack him and devalue his wordsā¦
Classical trumpism indeedā¦
This is not a thing.
And even if its been applied, there are plenty of actual words that exist already.
Somebody wasnāt told no and youāre wrong enough when they were a child.
1 Like
Duning-Kruger AND grandiose delusionsā¦
3 Likes
Wellā¦if iām not right why the effort of so many?
Either iām right or they have the problemā¦whatever it may be i win 
Or they are patiently (and, unfortunately, hopelessly) trying to explain why they think you are wrong.
The case where a person who thinks they are 100% right, but just about everyone says they are mistaken, is common among conspiracy theorists.
Wellā¦ bots.
āGadget is just sayinā
Itās funny to think about how heās probably fooled by you making it sound like thatād be a good thing. 
It is not! Dunning-Kruger can not be observed outside of discussions with actual points and arguments. Discussions are where people lay out known information and logical conclusions based on this information. Dunning-Kruger requires that there already is some amount of knowledge and understanding about a topic stored within the brain.
The effect can be observed when someone forms a logical conclusion based on an, from the outside perspective, limited amount of information. The person is unaware of the fact that his logical construct is missing information and the person is also stuck in the wrong belief that logical conclusions are always correct. The latter is quite common.
Not once did he ever bring any actual arguments or reasons to the table, which did not ultimately end up with him pointing at the āmillions of peopleā who are apparently just like him. He has a lot of anger stored inside and he is very, very good at controlling and suppressing it. I lovingly call him Mr. BroomStickUpHisAss.
1 Like
?
Your line. For small brains itās readable as you praising him. I thought you deliberately wrote it that way.
Despite talking much you are saying remarkably lessā¦i mean remarkably less usable that is no taunt or childishā¦
Why donāt we talk about your mother. 
1 Like
Why donāt we talk about your distractions to avoid a discussion?
You werenāt actually taking part in a discussion. There was, in fact, not really a discussion going on at all. A discussion requires at least two people to bring up actual points. Data. Insights. You can easily observe a lack of these requirements in your very own posts. You never bring up points, information or data. You simply declare what is right or wrong, as if you had the authority to do so. Clearly you have not.
There is no point in even trying talking to you, because you are not capable of dealing with opposition. Opposition forces you to deal with the suppression of your anger. Thatās why you ādeclareā instead of actually talking to people.
Iāve observed your behaviour. You jump into threads literally making declarations of who and what is right or wrong. You do not argue with people, you simply tell them they are wrong. You leave a conversation at the first sign of danger of you losing even the slightest amount of self control, happening when youāve made the āmistakeā of actually starting talking to people and when they manage to ārub you the wrong wayā. Youāve been showing the same behaviour, writing the same things, for at least one year or probably two.
3 Likes
Whateverā¦
I guess that shows how accurate my post is.
3 Likes
QEDā¦
You know how we all hated that guy who spammed upper cut in Mortal Kombat and he just kept telling you that you needed to get better at the game?
But we all knew the game was broken, upper cut in the corner was opād.
Null-secārs are that guy