(With apologies to Gix, I cannot edit this post to un-reply to him)
Someone(s) are trying to flag all my posts as being offensive/abusive or violating community guidelines. If the flagger prefers having community members who make unapologetic homophobic comments unchallenged, then it says more about the flagger than me.
Lots of the people who criticized him over the past day just had their posts hidden. Meanwhile, his homophobic ones are still up. So I doubt it’s a mod doing this; looks like he’s alt-reporting those posts or getting friends to do it with him.
You are hooked on one harmless joke, pulling it out of context, and artificially inflate the conflict out of nothing, dragging here some kind of disadvantaged gays and other indecencies.
Ready to humiliate themselves as much as necessary, just to get away from the topic. Enough.
I am not part of a community of high sec gankers. Go back and re-read this thread where I and others have made suggestions for improvement and highlighted how simple saying “safe zone” is not a workable solution.
So you think newcomers are being bullied. Define newcomer please.
I have been in game now for almost 2 years. I still class myself in many ways as a newcomer. Do you agree? Should i be allowed to fly around in 100% safety all the time. I don’t think i should be. I think i should face risk as it makes the game richer.
So when is a newcomer not a newcomer? After a day? After a week? After a month? After login 20 hours of active gameplay? 50 hours? 100 hours? Or as our friend Arzimaton suggests……when you can fly a battleship with faction mods (which is interesting in the context of his earlier complaints about being ganked in a blingy Raven). Based on that definition if i never fly a battleship or only fly battleships with T1 mods am i newcomer forever? And as such immune to ganking forever?
And these are the problems. You have no answers to these questions because you dont care about newbies at all. Your agenda is simply to get CCP to create a safe area where risk adverse players can destroy the ecoonomy without interacting with the core game or the community.
Where’s players like myself that are being referred to as vile, sick and subjected to homophobic slurs are making productive suggestions around the data CCP have presented. What data you may ask………well refer to my previous posts for the detail and problems with the data……but in summary. Player retention is better among players who have lost ships.
As for suggestions………
-Improve the NPE to better explain ship loss and ganking mechanics.
-Be clear about the benefits of flying smaller ships. New players dont need battleships. T1 exploration frigates are fun, cheap and profitable
-Improving starter corps and weeding out spam invites form exploiter corps in starter systems.
Amongst many other things.
If this makes me “sick” in your eyes then it says far more about you than it does about me.
It’s very telling that the two people in this thread accusing others of bullying newbies are the ones making and defending homophobia and insinuations that in person violence is a “good lesson”
While telling others they are sick and vile.
Please take a look in the mirror and have a little self awareness about how you are coming across
Clown, you are quoting the result and not the solution to the problem.
Obviously, we are talking about the price of loot in relation to the price of spent ganker ships.