You already know and already said the answer in this very thread. Lets use the way back to (yesterday) machine.
You quoted me here with more cherry picking:
Where I explained in full:
But you decided to ignore the full statement and only quote:
Now if you’re going to troll about things you have DIRECTLY QUOTED by choosing to forget them in full because they contradict your bias then you’re done because you can’t argue.
This thread is based on heresay
It’s not based on anything said by CCP so really no one cares
It needs to die for that simple fact
You two have been arguing for over a day now, might as well get a room and make out…
No, I’m asking you, because you keep dodging the question. You then write a lot, like saying it continues and in another sentence further down do you then contradict your statement and say it doesn’t. So I don’t know.
Answered already.
I’m afraid, you didn’t. You need to make this simpler for me. Is it or is it not tied to it?
Goodbye then.
To avoid extending the thread:
https://forums.eveonline.com/guidelines#agreeable
You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But, remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:
Knee-jerk contradiction.
Even the US president answers questions, only you don’t.
Bye-bye!
Interesting statement. So when you refuse an answer does that make you worse?
To announce that there must be no criticism of the president… is morally treasonable to the American public.
-Theodore Roosevelt.
Yes.
Here is a question for you.
Do you know what the two most commonly and most simple answers to a question are?
Yes.
No.
Then when you have been answered and choose to deny that answer because you refuse to listen you confirm you are wrong.
We now know what your problem is. You fail to answer a question with a simple Yes and No.
Ergo:
Thank you for ignoring me. Proves you can’t contradict the facts. In addition you are now well beyond open trolling.
I have asked you a question, which you can asnwer with a simple Yes or No.
When you fail at giving answers, then you’re not interested in a discussion and are not willing to provide meaningful responses.
We can try this again of course…
Is the object tied to the wardec timer (Yes) or is it not (No)?
Yes
No
Yes. It starts your war.
Now you’re going to ask it again. You are also going to ignore it again.
Thank you very much for your kind answer, Sir.
May I ask a follow-up question, please?
Yes
No
And just when I thought we could have a meaningful conversation do you fall flat on your face.
You’re amazing! 
You can stop asking rhetorical questions then. You ask “may I ask a follow-up question, please?” is literally a follow up question.
I take that as a No.
I wish you’d have said Yes.
Then you’re not listening.
Ask another question.