That’s not how we do things. There’s no voting, and there’s no reason to do voting because most of what we do has nothing to do with supporting or opposing proposed changes. But, as noted in the blog post we wrote, everybody unanimously supported these changes.
That includes a high sec guy, a low sec guy, and a bunch of null sec guys on opposite sides of the nullsec political aisle.
I think you’ve been listening to your own press far too long Brisc.
Actions speak louder than CSM words, you guys ARE ALL TALK because the changes you advocate are bullsh#t changes that keep crabbing safer and the ones you should advocate are only talked about. The evidence is there for all to see.
I hope that CCP scraps the CSM entirely (clearly not working to represent the player base) and replaces it with focus groups.
At least we wouldnt have to put up with the only CSM/CCP person responding doing so with ridicule and contempt for those that disagree with him. ‘Everyone i talk to thinks as I do’ - what a load of crap.
If we were all talk, nothing would get done. Obviously we’re more than “all talk” because things are getting done. That’s the opposite of being all talk.
I’m not responding to most people here with ridicule and contempt. I’ve been here, mostly civil, while you and others have crapped on me, questioned my motives, questioned my intelligence, questioned whether I have an agenda, questioned whether I even play the game, accused me of only caring about nullsec/goons/miners/ratters/etc, of not listening, and a variety of other things - about the only thing you guys haven’t said is that I killed Kennedy.
Still here, still reading the feedback, still interacting, still passing it on.
Everyone I talk to doesn’t think as I do, by the way - I am passing on what they think to you when I say that. As I noted before, I don’t particularly care one way or the other on this change. I think its a good change for the game, but it wasn’t my idea and not something I campaigned on, so it’s not like the change truly matters to me, unlike the FAX changes or war decs.
I’ll give you credit for showing up, and your performance on this thread is far better and more respectful than the one that the CSM and CCP should have listened to. But as i have already said its all talk.
You arent listening to the right people. Obviously.
I question the motives of the CSM because their actions only represent 0.0 block groups. Obviously.
The things that are ‘getting done’ are getting done poorly (ECM nerf without balance or real thought, killing an entire line of ships) and they are the wrong things. Obviously.
Vague notions of ‘passing on feedback’ is just bollocks man. Obviously. There was a massive thread FULL of criticism and ideas about this balance pass. What did CCP respond to? The WH rolling mechanic, nothing else.
You are a CSM member, you aren’t supposed to be responding to anyone with ridicule or contempt. This is why I said your conduct is unprofessional.
I have no beef about the ECM changes or anything in the CSM minutes . I am saying that IMO You are proving that you are not cut out for the position. You should have asked yourself if you have the proper temperament for it before putting yourself forward as a candidate.
Responding is fine, ridiculing a poster by asking him for his stuff is beneath what he should be doing, let alone making jokes about people’s real life political beliefs.
When you accept a position of responsibility (even one representing nerds in a spaceship video game), you shouldn’t do things like that. After his time on the CSM is up, then it’s whatever, but he just doesn’t have to temperament and it shows.