Or whatever else you feel like deciding disqualifies them right after they ask.
ā¦ Is there a point at which we can declare something off-topic to the Off-Topic thread? Like, āOn-topic for a topic so utterly boring it should be consigned to some sort of data-oubliette because no sane person actually wants to keep up with it?ā
3 Likes
Let them fight. Well I say fight, but itās more of a one-sided pummeling.
1 Like
It should be on topic to be off topic for the off topic.
This seems like the whole āimmovable object/irresistible forceā thing, though. Even if we see blows landing, nothing changes.
Is it really a pummeling if the subject is immune to further harm?
1 Like
Cannot see why recurring topics in off-topic could not have their own thread? āArrendis monologuing at Diana Kimā would be an entirely valid IGS topic.
6 Likes
In before the IGS is nine-tenths āX rants about Y at Zā stickies.
ā¦ I canāt actually tell whether this would be an improvement or not.
2 Likes
I wonder would anyone even read that past first sentence?
Shhhhh that was the secret! Now the fans know and itās only a matter of time before they start sending in fanart!
1 Like
If that was supposed to be a secret, itās clear that neither of us knew. It was the most poorly kept āsecretā that thereās ever been.
Pretty sure that literally everyone, including the fanclubs, already knew.
Gasp !
Even I knew.
1 Like
Can confirm that wasnāt really at all a secret.
1 Like
Itās not like theyād need fan-art. After all, there was Karaoke night at LāAmore in April of last year. Arsia sang love songs. I sang a hate song. It was, yāknow, kinda cute. Oh, and I sang about people burning to death, too! Fun night.
1 Like
Well I didnāt know, but I didnāt care, so thereās that.
Well of course I knew, you lot are no fun.
I think youād be more likely to know than most, really. I enjoy talking to you, after all.
1 Like
Itās especially funny when thatās what they accuse other people of and make a huge fuss about.
Oh ffs forum system, of course the body of this message is similar to something else I posted, itās because itās the exact same, only this time in a correct place.
2 Likes
The one thing you can trust a hypocrite to be consistent on is their hypocrisy.
1 Like
But only selectively. Itās not like you intent to impose any consequences for allying with those who worked to ensure Amarr systems fell to the Triglavians, right? Ooh, Iāll bet you wonāt be imposing any consequences on alliances that made common cause with Ushraākhan by agreeing to prevent Amarr militia pilots from taking certain warzone systems in that whole scandal that caused the Reclaiming of Floseswin either, will you? Cuz, yāknow, you work for those āletās cut a deal with UāKā guys now.
Funny, though, how they never seem to remember cutting that deal while they rant about people working with the far less extreme Electus Matariā¦