My work must be continuing to have quite an impact if the Amarr capsuleers have begun to censor ‘Victoria’ from their writings.
On a serious note, though, crazy capsuleers being crazy is truly one thing that the majority of capsuleers seem to agree on. The dissenting minority tends to be merely the crazy capsuleers themselves.
You know, for a moment I took compunction to that but… Y’got me, I think thats actually very cogent.
Yeah. Like. Thats the point right? He’s thesis, I’m antithesis. I like that, I think you’re onto something. Not saying that Drust has a point, but I detect a bit of synthesis going on here. If I’m starting to sound like Drust then maybe Drust will start sounding like me, Galm.
I think this is the beginning of a beautiful parasocial relationship, he and I.
And here we see why dialectical materialism is something intelligent people flirt with in college, and quickly get over once they’ve got a smidgen of experience dealing with reality. Shouldn’t you be failing to grow a whispy goatee and wearing an ascot by now?
Can you explain to me, in detail please, why basing decisions in material concerns rather than pseudo-intellectual platitudes like whatever you’re on about is discredited by a “smidgen of experience” because its served me pretty well compared to the usual pedantic, insufferable garbage people like you hitch their wagon to.
You have nothing of substance to add here, other than project the fact that someone has clearly had this argument with you before and you haven’t gotten over it. I wonder why that is.
Dialectical materialism is self evident. It can’t be disproven as tosh it can only be willfully ignored or abandoned because its inconvenient when you need to lie to yourself to justify compromising your own interests. And you call me the boot licker.
Yeah, not doing this. The summit has rules against this sort of thing and I’m going to leave it to them to handle since nothing productive will come from this.