I can personally confirm you spoke over the FC several times and there were multiple “clear comms” orders issued while you tried to protest the FC’s decisionmaking, especially regarding bringing a Maller back to the fight when it didn’t fit doctrine. Which, needless to say, died instantly.
1 Like
beka z was dzielni chlopcy zza biurka nieustanna
my bad man ,it just sounded a bit like a brag <3
Or, hear me out, the FC was trash.
Like seriously, you are believing in a conspiracy that never happened. Have you ever thought for once your “Source” was ■■■■■■■ with you and lying to you? We don’t need to pay for content. The entire world is telling you it is not true yet you continue to believe your “Source.” Have you ever vetted your source? Have you ever found corroborating evidence outside circumstantial evidence? All I see is you are operating off of hearsay and put too much faith in a FC’s experience.
I can see why you were booted so damn fast from their corp. They nipped a problem in the butt before it became a huge problem.
1 Like
If your Alliance doctrines are very similar, and your “enemies” know the fleets you field always carry the same fittings, don’t you think reason your fleet was met with a perfect counter was that your fittings had been previously analysed from previous killmails so it was easier to counter? Rather than a rogue element in your group?
And you say you are relatively new. Well, many players have been playing for years and they have got to know people who have moved to other corps / alliances, but they still remain friends ingame even if the standing at a particular time changes to red. What are they going to do? Suddenly hate on each other like mortal enemies? I mean, if you had a friend and you suddenly get paired against him in CounterStrike, would you stop talking to him completely? Or just play the game normally and still be friends?
So when these people end up in different corps and remain friends, they may still have access to 3rd party discords and still hang out online even if they happen to have to play against each other within eve online.
Consider all that.
4 Likes
I see that now you’re resorting to flat out lying which is always comforting. It makes me feel at ease knowing that Operation: Snake Hunters is still a much needed service. He spoke to me first and asked why I was in a Maller, the reason being I had already died in my Caracal, and had gone to Roden, gotten in a new ship, and returned to the fleet before he even noticed, and without me speaking once.
Many times I’ve wondered if the source was telling the truth. And if you took the time to actually read the message transcripts that were in the original Post you would understand that I had my doubts. But when they kicked me without even confronting me about the source, that made things a bit more clear.
I did take the time. Again, there is nothing in there to believe. And they kicked you because this is was one thing among many issues they had with you. It is the proverbial “straw that broke the camels back.”
Another person who feels entitled to comment on a post that they didn’t even read. or possibly skimmed through and decided to spout their opinion like an overflowing toilet bowl. If an FC is bribed, and they are going to throw a fight, yes, obviously they are going to run the same fleet composition that they previously ran, with no changes, to make things much easier.
You are now basing your opinion on heresay from them. Unless you were to believe one of the other snakes who are flat out lying about me disturbing coms other than the first week that I joined. I learned from what they told me, and I was not a problem during fleet operations in my final week. The only outstanding factor was the intel I relayed to Dwerth, and Entropy’s insecurity regarding my questioning of his targeting hours after the fight was over.
I won’t say the name of my source, just like I would hope my name is kept secret as well. But to relay the information: someone suspects that whoever was manning the guns at the station last night was the one that also leaked the info simultaneously through a second live voice chat since the response was instantaneous.
This person also has reason to believe that said, ‘unnamed,’ person who was manning the guns at the new place would have tried to prevent interference or tactical response regardless of what the enemy fleet was actually composed of. And all the, “trash talking,” in local about ‘no content,’ was really just an act to cover-up the real plan.
For security reasons since I’m assuming, ‘The New Place,’ belongs to you: I would highly reccommend leading the final defense fleet of your structure based on your own intel, logic, and strategy. And perhaps nominating a different person to man the guns at the station just, ‘to simplify things.’ A trusted Aggro Bears member would be my first thought.
Let me take this second message and break it down…
- "someone suspects that whoever was manning the guns at the station last night was the one that also leaked the info simultaneously through a second live voice chat since the response was instantaneous."
They suspect, they don’t know. So you are basing this all over someone who suspects something is going on.
- "This person also has reason to believe that said, ‘unnamed,’ person who was manning the guns at the new place would have tried to prevent interference or tactical response regardless of what the enemy fleet was actually composed of. And all the, “trash talking,” in local about ‘no content,’ was really just an act to cover-up the real plan."
This person has reason to believe. So they don’t know for a fact? So it is just an uneducated guess? So again, you are basing it off of nothing more than someone’s suspicion and you took it as truth.
Now, on to your more recent response. No, I am not basing my opinion on hearsay, you are the one that is literally doing it and I even pointed it out. I was in the attacking fleet laughing at how terribly ran fleets y’all had. We were all were. I don’t talk to Patchwork. Never have.
Also, when you say you weren’t a problem in your recent fleet operations, that means nothing, that still sticks and will be brought back up again when you question the allegiance of the leader and FC. You were in the military, you should know, if you are going to accuse a commanding officer of treason, you BEST have hard evidence which you have none. Also, even if it were true, you are a line member, if they wanted you to know, they would let you know. You know, need to know basis.
2 Likes
I have a very difficult time believing someone who brings armor ships to shield fleets that the FCs intentionally threw the fights.
4 Likes
I am not responding to this anymore. You are extremely ignorant. You don’t even suspect your “Source” of planting a knife in your back for you to start all this nonsense and causing drama.
Peace
It’s quite exhausting having to reference the original post, but again, I did not say at any point that ‘I know’ these things to be true. I was kicked and banned purely for relaying what I heard to Dwerth. The fact that they kicked me for simply relaying intel is the issue, with no confrontation whatsoever.
You questioned the allegiance of leadership. You caused trouble in fleets before this (timeline doesn’t matter.) I would of done the same thing.
Welcome to EVE bro. Your source could of planted a knife in your back.
2 Likes
Hilarious. So funny. Considering I was one of the only members in the entire fleet who had a backup ship in a neighboring system, so that after I died on the shield ship, “assuming Entropy would throw us into a trap on shields,” That I could come back with a different resistance type. Mind Boggling isn’t it.
Sure, anything is possible. I doubt it based on the reactions of Dwerth and Entropy, but sure, again, anything is possible here. Given the evidence from my perspective it seems unlikely but hey, you have a different perspective, and that’s fine.
Or maybe they just did not care? Or maybe they just used whatever fittings were widely available? Or maybe the FC felt most comfortable with those fittings because he knew them best? Or … there’s a myriad of reasons for fielding the same doctrines on a fight, other than a “bribe” to lose an inconsequential fight.
And why would the Alliance heads conspire to hand over the territory and go through so much trouble? They can just hand it over with no issue whatsoever and that’s it. Allegiances in EVE change all the time. The reds you fight today can be your fight mates a couple of weeks from now.
Finally, they kicked you out because you are toxic, delusional and hysterical, throwing random accusations around and causing huge drama - as all these posts from you clearly prove. Your former corp mates are here claiming you were constantly breaking the engagement rules and throwing accusatory indirects around. Your paranoia-fueled conversation with Dwerth was the last straw, apparently. I’m sure they had had it with you and that was the last of it.
You claim to be relatively new to EVE and instead of listening to what people are telling you - people who have vastly more experience in the game than you do - you are just sticking your head in the sand and keep on babbling about wild conspiracies. Maybe you should go take a few days rest from EVE, come back later with a cooler head, and go through all this again and see all this from a different perspective.
4 Likes
Hell, even the alliance that was attacking them thinks he is batshit.
2 Likes