Which is an offence meriting a ban… Either a foolish admission, or a foolish jest.
1 Like
You can offer the right for 10M and get a bit back of your loss. But what I‘m talking about are players unaware about the consequences of their killrights doing business in expensive highsec ships.
It’s just PI, this minor loss is neglectable. And I reckon this char is gone again, so in this case the KR is nice, but futile.
I just wonder what part of KR doesn’t work anymore?
For me personally I sub to omega for the covert cloak only but if CCP nerf covert cloak, I will just stay alpha. Omega is also unnecessary and a waste of isk if the only ship you fly is just a tech 1 destroyer.
I need to point out Killright still works.
They only disabled the client side update that shows in local or the overview if there is a player with a killright.
You can still click on a player, see the activate killright and activate it. Due to this misunderstanding more people with killrights have been flying around and also been losing their ships. It is basically how it was at the very start of killrights. You had to click on each player in your overview.
6 Likes
Well, this I didn’t know, thanks for the info! But I’m not much in highsec these days anyway.
@CCP_Dopamine - no response just means I am correct in my assertions - CCP are now admitting retribution was an awful expansion and are now endeavouring to wipe the stains of said terrible “expansion” under the carpet. At the very least provide an update or confirm acceptance that Retribution was a terrible expansion. Failure to again reply from a Senior Community Developer 3 months after the initial post is just indicative of confirmation of the points I’ve just made.
1 Like
You do understand that they are testing performance issues, not the actual impact of these features on player interaction, right?
You are also in way owed a response from any CCP employees.
Do you understand that CCP sometimes release terrible features and expansions that even with test server playerbase feedback saying it is terrible - they release anyway. I think you need to get your CCP tinted glasses off toots!
The fact a Senior Eve Developer can’t fathom a response after 3 months of data is indicative of CCP wanting to conveniently try and brush a terrible expansion under the carpet - I am not wrong in this assertion.
You are making an assertion in an absence of evidence. CCP devs do not reply to 90% or more of posts where they are pinged. Attributing their decision to not respond to you to you being right is fallacious.
Clutch at straws toots - I’ve made my point - if CCP chose to respond or not does not detract from the fact that if they don’t the points I have made are veritas until otherwise contested. Retribution was a terrible expansion. CCP are endeavouring to bury the fail of said expansion, and the fact that after 3 months of data there has been no update in this thread as to what is happening to bounty isk - is just another indicative indictment of CCP trying to brush bad expansion under the carpet @CCP_Dopamine please engage opinion / finding / data after 3 months or remain tacit in acceptance of the points raised above case in veritas
Claiming something is true unless rebutted does not make that a fact. Keep up the rhetorical fallacies - it continues to undermine your credibility endlessly.
Err - so does the lack of CCP retort in this thread after 3 months - no update = trying to brush an awful “expansion” under the carpet in the hope nobody notices.
Or maybe they’re still collecting data, have no updates, and don’t want to waste their time posting a response because they know they’ll be flooded by a bunch of kids on the forum asking “but what about (completely unrelated thing)?”
1 Like
Another CCP alt - 3 months and no update per se - case in veritas
stuff like this is basically what I was talking about
1 Like
Hot gas and nonsense?
You sound like a broken record. Repeating a claim does not make it true. Your premise if horribly flawed. Saying it over and over does not change that fact.
1 Like
Please try harder CCP rep