Player Harassmemt, by bumping

They need to watch this video.

1 Like

I donā€™t care what your ā€œforum statusā€ view of me is.

I donā€™t care if you grant me the favor of your response.

2 Likes

This explains a lot.

1 Like

Indeed. It explains at least two things:

  1. Why I sometimes describe myself as a ā€œserial beginnerā€, ā€œserial rookieā€ etc to save space.
  2. Why I donā€™t care when some dimwit uses a vague but ominous-sounding open statement in the hope there might be something in one of my past posts I regret. I donā€™t make stuff up when I post. Feel free to continue dedicating your time to reading my old posts. It will be good for you.

And yet you argue and troll people who have played for many years.

4 Likes

A smart person would consider what subjects I discuss before saying something like that.

You should read some of my posts before you fumble around looking for criticisms. At least there will be a small chance youā€™re on topic.

You really should not post any opinion in these forums any more; youā€™re obsolete.

2 Likes

I was about to call you a whiner, but you have a point regarding the EULA and harassment.
They hide in Public Corps so we canā€™t do anything in response.
I say make them ā€œsuspectā€ or even better ā€œcriminalā€ in high sec areas for bumping.

You know every now and again I think about coming back read a post like this, and realise the same ā– ā– ā– ā–  is going on and nothing has improved or changed and forget about it.

P.S no you canā€™t have my stuff, the only nice thing about Eve now is logging in and seeing my net worth has gone up before logging out again.

Send me your ISK and Iā€™ll double your net worth.

5 Likes

Another stalker!! Welcome to the litter /lol.

Youā€¦donā€™t know who TEST are? *
image

1 Like

Thats kind of a weird way to put it, but okay.

I mean, you might be a master Tournament winner at Starcraft 2, but if its your first time playing a first person shooter like Call of Duty, chances are youre not going to be very good. One area of PVP prowess doesnt necessarily transfer over to another.

And yeah, I understand what youre saying, and I find it as just a fact of video games.

World of warcraft is probably the most popular MMO in the history of MMOs, but there are people who found it boring. There is always going to be an aspect of grind that would put someone off from a certain game.

No one is saying that ā€œALLā€ the people who choose not to stay would have never enjoyed EVE. I dont think theres a single person who actually means EVERY SINGLE PERSON, EVER.

But the difference with other games and EVE, and that youre missing out, is that the so called ā€œEnd-game contentā€ that most other video games have, doesnt exist in eve, in so much that any beginning player can join in on what every vet is doing.

There is no necessary barrier preventing new players from doing almost anything that a vet can do, nor do we consider the things that only vets can do, as end-game content.

Thats how we know that many, if not most people who left eve, wouldve left eve eventually either way. If you dont like first person shooters, youre not going to like Call of Duty. Theres no telling whether or not you may have enjoyed end-game PVP tournaments, but chances are unlikely.

1 Like

Today a new player was in my system, asking for help attacking a ā€œpirate baseā€, which I knew to be a Guristas refugee camp. I decided to form a fleet. We were then tethered together, and he did not seem to notice my glowing red aura, perhaps because CCPā€™s tutorial utterly fails to explain or even acknowledge PvP.

Anyways, I decided to bump him off tether, while he talked about his awesome new shipā€¦ however, I remembered this thread, and didnā€™t want to be accused of harassmemt. Therefore, I fleetwarped him to the sun, where I promptly shot him.

6 Likes

Not weird. Protection against equivocation. I wish it wasnā€™t necessary, but collectively, this forum is severely ā€œlogic-impairedā€, so I do what I must.

A lot of people say it here, including the guy who induced the post you replied to. Itā€™s an obvious ā€œfaulty generalizationā€, but itā€™s still part of the standard ā€œbittervet narrativeā€. Itā€™s also one of the more toxic parts of that narrative, because itā€™s a ā€œcall to inactionā€.
In fact youā€™re doing much the same thing below, though in the less extreme form the that other guy I was talking to.

You got that from some eccentric claims, which I can summarize with one quote:

This isnā€™t false, but it doesnā€™t describe what actually happens. The interesting question isnā€™t something like
ā€œCan a new player have fun if they join the right nullSec Corp?ā€.
Itā€™s
ā€œWhat proportion of new players actually join a high-end (e.g. nullSec) Corp, and of those, how many stay in EVEā€?
The two-stage question is essential, or weā€™d get caught in a ā€œpetitio principiiā€ fallacy.

It wouldnā€™t surprise me at all if new players who joined a nullSec Corp stay in EVE. But if thereā€™s a pre-req not available to most beginners (like the ā€œGoonsā€ old technique (participate in a non-EVE online forum (Something Awful?) forums for a year of two) itā€™s not correct to draw any conclusion about new players who donā€™t meet that requirement.

I donā€™t see where youā€™re going with your conclusions related to other games. For any given type of game, or specific game within the type, thereā€™s plenty of evidence that some will like it, some will not.

We can conclude (unnecessarily :slight_smile: that not everyone will like EVE.

But it tells us nothing about why EVE has an exceptionally poor retention rate

What does need to be considered is two related questions:

  1. What kind of person tries EVE (regardless of whether they leave or not)?
  2. If those, do a significant proportion of them come to EVE without any understanding of the type of game is, or of its more obvious of its defining characteristics?

The ā€œbittervet narrativeā€ (and, to some extent, yours) only works if the answer to (2) is ā€œa large proportion have no idea, and leave because they discover EVE is the wrong type of game for themā€.

II donā€™t see how that could be true. EVE is 15 years old. Information is readily available (including e.g. the free-fire PvP characteristic, and loss of equipment in PvP). And both the game and its players both have terrible reputations. How many new EVE players wouldnā€™t learn all this, and decide to try EVE anyway?

The only way the ā€œbittervet narrativeā€ works is if most of the people who try EVE are very poorly informed about EVE, and/or have hardly any online gaming experience of any kind.
Perhaps it was true in 2008, though even then EVEā€™s reputation was well established and well publicized . But itā€™s 2019 now - I donā€™t buy the ā€œmost new players are ignorant about EVEā€ assumption.

  1. Why would I? Theyā€™re not relevant to me, nor to anything Iā€™ve posted.
  2. Is this knowledge a requirement for posting on this forum?

(editing for spelling)

Interesting. Freudian slip or simple typo.

Wellā€¦TEST is a fairly prominent EvE entity and has been for some time. Not even knowing their name when they have been heavily involved with some pretty major events in EvE for quite a while speaks to your general knowledge of the game you expound upon at length.

2 Likes

Youā€™re making false claims. Again. Interesting that you didnā€™t learn your lesson last time /lol.

My post says (approximately) TEST arenā€™t relevant to me; TEST (as a specific Corp of course, not a type of Corp) arenā€™t relevant to anything Iā€™ve posted about.

Prove me wrong. Or work on being less economical with the truth.

Heā€™s right. Thereā€™s your proof. You have been found ignorant by community consensus.

7 Likes

So I can take that to mean you donā€™t trade in Perimeter?