This is why nobody wants to vote for you, crazy witch has a degree in that department.
well. working as it specialist too. it seems you never have played stellaris. With the crazy scientist. has 5% more research speed. but sometimes some mental breakdowns. That happens. But sure, if you speak for all, then this is good for you. i guess at least.
I actually made a psychologist fall asleep once.
wll i do not judge what you do in your freetime
Safe to say nobody is surprised by this.
Hey if you want Frostpacker to vote you should comeup with more on your roleplay as per your opening.
/@Uriel_the_Flame true, I think it was the story I was telling.
well still working on that … check the youtube channel for more.
Poor Frostpacker, roleplay denied
.
No roleplay is live right unless you prefer scripted, either we don’t mind.
Looks like voting will be denied?
well Mr. Frostpacker. We have several roleplay aspects videos here on my youtube channel. I dont want to link them all. Its up to you to discover it.
Like Operation Opsec, or the Triglavia Theorem for example. But you need to go thru the process of discovering. I do not recover 4 years of roleplay here, especially when it tooks sometimes 180 hours to make a 3 minute video for you so you can watch it.
Mr Frostpacker has showcased on multiple occasions that he is yet to develop the virtue of patience and strong work ethic. Just one of the latest such examples below.
He is a miner so obviously he prefers that others do the work for him instead of doing the work himself:
Besides it is a well known fact that:
That is just the start. There is a long list of what Frostpecker requires and aiko in a yellow suit is not one of them.
@Prospektor_Schipplock Do you support hiring (EVE Vanguard) Warclone Mercenaries as an attack/defense vector in Capsuleer conflicts? Like attacking/defending Planetary Infrastructure, Skyhooks/POCOs and Upwell Structures?
As a CSM would you try and pitch for CCP to make stack multi-split (splitting a stack of items into multiple stacks of same size in one go instead of just on split at a time) happen?
Like your EDENCOM videos
Hey Elinore, after Vanguard is still Work in Progress (ok EDENCOM Logo on the Weapon has found their way into the game), i totally support this.
Regarding your Multi-Split. may i ask you for which reason you need this ? I am happy with the Split Option, but yes, why not ?
thx for loving our videos.
How are you going to protect Highsec against the Evil Gankers? What are you going to tell to the CCP employees once in Iceland?
Well after Ganking is some crucial part of eve online, we could make some adjustments, like if you gank for exmaple in EDENCOM Systems, you also can get negative EDENCOM Standing, especially, if players have EDENCOM Standing at this point. This could lead to some Gunstar Approach on Sight, and maybe could develop some approach on this point.
I mean protection against gankers is some point of view. There is a Role in which you can act to do this as player, or corporation - flying with Stormbringers (for example helps getting rid of gankers). And we had some good experience with that.
Also having 2 Stormbringers in an Orca, where you switch into the Ships, while gankers attempt you to gank, was in the past also a good approach here.
Removing ganking itself is maybe not the way i see in the future, But some adjustments should be possible.
adjustments! aka NERF!
why is this a nerf ? I think some changes regarding faction standings, should impact on the other side.
And if that creates some spots, where you are “pretty safe”, why not ? You still can gank as usual on the routes they are camped atm. But you also can create some safe areas, especial for beginners.
And from my point of perspective EDENCOM Systems seems to be a good systems here.
I dont understand how Stormbringers get rid of gankers, care to explain this then?:
I see many inconsistencies in your arguments.
well being afk, and felt asleep while mining op is something that should not happen. but it happened. I see no fault here. Should i start now posting all the catalysts i killed meanwhile ?