Prospektor Schipplock, the Alternative for CSM 19

oh then you recognize that the only adjustement to do is to wake up instead of being sleepy, very good.

losses by safety and norvus ordo

And if you want get this personal adressed, just let me know. Then i put this on my personal agenda. I thought i sent you a clear message, by painting your killboard red.

but if you want to make fun of it now, we can change that in the future.

what is your opinion about this years Oktoberfest?

prices are high on octoberfest. I don’t go there :). but it’s good to see that i’m a thorn in your side, maybe your posts will just get more people to vote for me, then we’ll be happy to take a look at the problem with you:)

What about your past? You and your corporation killed peaceful miners. It was bloody murders of guys who cant answer. Tell me pls, what you think about it? How it correlate with all what you saying about you peaceful position? Selenitas structure support | Corporation | zKillboard - one of them, for example

Incredible what you did to Selenitas. Unstable candidates should not be part of the CSM. I was about to vote for you, but not anymore.

EWOKS CRUSADERS | Corporation | zKillboard Looks like Evoks crusaders, your corporation, even ganked peaceful ppl.

ahh some personal vendetta here ? well, maybe you should judge me that i former was part of goons. Or whatever ? Maybe you should dig at the beginning of eve, where i lost a rokh in lowsec.

Such a pity !

First. Ewoks Crusaders was not my corporation. I was just a member, i followed orders, and leave after some time. So relax…

But just keep on ongoing digging in the dirt. You must be very proud of you just being gankers right ?

Advanced Search - Ewoks Crusaders & Prospektor Schipplock

I dont see any ganks here. But who am i to judge ?

So, you was ganker right? I just asking. Its your game, its your words, speeches. I even not a part of that guys who died from your hands. I just asked you and you cant give me answer. Looks like your point is best defence is attack. How you will communicate with eve ppls like part of CSM? You will same angry looks like

I think you did not get the point right. This Dirt Campaign you do here, just makes the people heard up, because its intersting, that Norvus ordo or Safety or all gankers, now allied, together to put my campaign into dirt.

There is a difference between ganking and pvp. If someone needs to get rid of, and you define this as a gank. well then its your choice to say, Hey look , the bad prospektor etc…

I dont do ganking - but yes sometimes i shot some peoples in catalysts.

But just traverse the Killboard. Every time you speak louder, it even makes it more interesting for other voters here, to vote for me, because you do this dirt campaign.

1 Like

And you not answered again. Ok. Looks like you cant communicate ppls and can not be part of CSM. Fly safe!

yeah i highly understand that the sentence “I dont do ganking”, does not match to your question - “you are a ganker right ?”.

But maybe its only me, that cant read this.

Statistics Prospektor Schipplock with Tag “Ganked”

ill help you here a bit.

beside Whack a bot. - no no ganks here -

1 Like

You are now our 2nd pick on the ballot.

Good luck!

1 Like

thx a lot

O7 Prospektor Schipplock,

Last year I asked eight questions and then compiled the answers into a huge mega-thread. It was massive. With the exception of MILINT_ARC_Trooper, no one had a thread bigger than mine, to be fair MILINT_ARC_Troopers’ thread was so weighty and knowledgable it teetered on the edge of collapsing into its’ own core.

That catalogue of replies is now a time-capsule and encapsulated within are the hopes and disappointments that CSM 18 candidates considered worth speaking about during the year of EVE’s 20th anniversary.

The responses gave voters en masse an opportunity to test and compare each hopeful CSM 18 candidates commitment to their claims of being community oriented, knowledgable, responsive and representative of player values. Given that the CSM does not directly control any aspect of EVE’s development and that the successful candidates are those that can identify existing and future consequences, co-operate with other CSM members, and communicate issues -from a player perspective- to CCP staff one-to-one, I’ve formulated a set of questions designed to seperate the compressed ORE from the Long-Limb Roes in this years election race.

Year-on-year the Independent Representatives, Solo players with single accounts, Worm Holers, Triangle People, Semi-nomadic Role-Playing Sandbox Explorers, and Salvagers, have been organising and gaining traction against the self-secure Null-Bloc Empire Candidates and their vast hordes of leather-skinned, evil, flying-monkeys. More-and-more players are choosing to vote in members they believe can positively impact CCP’s approach to the game regardless of their in-game affiliations.

Exposure matters, who are you, what is your clue?
As was the process last year I will post each candidates reply in a super thread, first-in first-served.

This years questions:

  1. What ONE identifiable consequence requires CCP’s attention?

  2. What PROVABLE evidence can you supply to support your belief in this situation?

  3. What practical, and balanced change can be made to support a solution if any?

  4. What support do your observations have from other CSM candidates?

  5. How will you present your findings to CCP?

If you have already identified and spoken about a problem in your CSM candidacy bio at the top of this thread feel free to copy pasta that response where applicable. I’ll copy paste directly from your response to this post. Choose your goblet…. wisely.

Let the games begin, and may the odds ever be in your favour.

I honest prefer not to answer this question. But i do, because i choose to answer question in my thread.

  1. I understand that Powerblocks, have enough votes to easily bring the half of the CSM. But i miss the diversity here.

  2. This can be prooven by checking the old CSM Candidates, where at least more then half of the CSM was represented by 0-Blocks.

  3. I think CCP should cherry pick here, the best applicants to keep the whole story even.

  4. I dont know, because i do not have asked them recently.

  5. This question is unclear, do you mean, when i am CSM - or do you mean in general. I think CCP, is full aware of this Situation and changed the last CSM the rules regarding to that.

1 Like