That picture is exactly why ‘likes’ are an inappropriate way of measuring how good an idea is.
You’ve just demonstrated why your idea won’t work.
No no no. Everyone else is the narcissist.
No it shouldn’t.
You should understand that the vast majority of players don’t read the forums. Nor do they use reddit. The popularity of an idea on any platform is not representative of the game as a whole. Let alone the fact that it’s the bandwagon fallacy.
they wouldn’t have you as a customer, if only you followed through with your logic.
True for waiters at the local burger joint, not much else.
You suggest to strongarm ccp into replying to any cockamany - but popular - idea on the forum based on the number of whoevers who clicked the like/upvote. What kind of answers do you even expect ? An idea may be out of place now, but be good in a setting four years later. What kind of follow through would you expect ? If enough ideas are given polite attention, out of courtesy to paying customers, they will want to see at least some of them implemented. Do the customers run the game design and set the agenda, of course not. You may create a lot of false expectations as a company by replying to popular ideas, and then pay a new price in more whining and dissatisfaction because those good and popular ideas were not implemented.
I hope you now understand it’s a fine line ccp has to walk, and why communications our way are limited.
I think you were trying to explain something but you missed to write it down in words so other people can understand what you are talking about.
Your intellect is so large that I can understand where you are going with this. Do you?
Not sure how may times I have to explain the same things over and over again.
If CCP thinks IDEA BAD tell customer spaghetti code
if CCP things IDEA GOOD investigate if idea is worth implementing.
You are trying to paint some post apocalyptic scenario that only exists in your head.
In 1919, the suffrage movement had finally gained enough support, and Congress, grateful for women’s help during the war, passed the Nineteenth Amendment on June 5. With these words, Congress at last removed the legal bar to women’s right to vote:
Congress passed the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870. It says:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Should’ve seen it coming.
But women are not stupid enough to vote for something stupid unless it’s a bad joke.
Voted by elected officials, who are deemed worthy of office and deemed experts on the matter. See the difference with your idea ? Probably not, since you bring this up, totally out of the blue. The only thing they have in common is “voting”.
after going through this thread, reading your replies, indeed. It looks like
Moved to Forum Feedback & Requests
My point is that you belong to an ancient generation of old farts who think that only they know what’s good and bad. i.e. only men of white color should be allowed to vote. As you can see from history we were able to force changes so even the “common man”, women and black men who were consider to “stupid” to vote were allowed to vote.
How old were you in 1919 or even in 1870 lmao ? Do you have anything against other generations ? Why do you bring politics, color, age and history into a discussion about an idea, unless as a feeble attempt to make people shut up, or trying to needle them into making similar silly remarks ? Who is this “we” that you claim to belong to ? Whether you are insinuating, or not, that you’re neither white, male, or adult, who can tell. No one cares, and in a just environment it doesn’t even matter. Here, we are on the interwebz, where you can claim to be anything you fancy 
.
Yes, of course your vote matters, and no one in this thread contests that. But your vote doesn’t equate to an absolute right. What is opposed is 1) that ideas need to be put to a vote and 2) the part where “If an idea gets X amount of votes then CCP has to respond to the player base”. Your vote is not a right for an answer. In the end, with companies you vote via your wallet, that is the language they do understand. You can post an idea, and ccp may or may not pick it up - probably glancing over the thread responses to see if there are already gaping holes in the idea.
Imagine your idea here was put up for voting, that it garnered sufficient popular traction and “ccp has to respond”. Let’s say ccp doesn’t think the idea is sound. Would you have the same kind of response to their answer ? That would not end well, for your idea nor your forum access. You see, it’s not so much what you proposed as an idea, but how you behave when it is challenged or negatively judged that exemplifies why it is not such a good idea - to put it mildly.
Are you selectively reading the words that you want and interpreting things that at random?
How did you even get to some conclusion where you are interpreting my comment as is would be against anybody. The hole point of my thread and all the answers that I have provided is reiterate that everybody’s vote should count even if you and your gang of trolls are constantly implying that regular eve players are to stupid to vote for the “correct” things.
There is no discussion in this thread only trolls trying to prove that eve players are should not be allowed to vote because you have decided that they would not vote for the things you want.
This post by Hug sumerizes your contribution to this post.
I’m fighting in this thread so that ideas on the forum can fail or win for the right reasons not just because a gang of negative trolls decided to trash every thread on the eve forum.
Remove negative tolls from power and give it to the eve player mass.
@Brisc_Rubal can you give your thoughts?
Nope. I show how you are disconnected from the things YOU wrote.
Well, here’s a hint:
Ideas do not fail or win. You want them looked at and judged by ccp, and that is fair enough, and happens without voting. You, however, also want feedback and motivation. That is not going to happen for every idea, valid or not.
The first person (and one of a few) who introduced toxicity into this thread was … you 
notably in post 8:
as a response to his post which simply said:
You mean the person who stated in this thread that
It seems he doesn’t like your idea either, even added some toxic remarks, so what is the reason for this temporary blindness of yours, LOL ? And, on the subject of debating. Does it need explaining that a solid debate is based on presenting arguments instead of insults ? Hug’s post makes zero sense, it just fits in with your agenda, doesn’t it.
toxic trolls indeed
you seem eager to pick a fight with me, that’s your choice entirely
No. The masses don’t read the forums.
You’re trying to put ‘power’ into the people who can rally the most voters like null blocs do with the CSM.
Let me say that again; you’re putting power into the hands of a minority that can rally their members and tells them how to vote.
Let me put it another way.
Your idea has zero support. Every like in this thread is in opposition.
Sure I still prefer that outcome over the eve forum being trashed by negative trolls all day long.
Would you like me to join this thread with my “positive” alts?
How often are you going to shoot yourself in the foot ? But yes, please do log them in, that’s about the only way this idea of yours would ever make it past the first hurdle.
Ah, the hypocrisy, gotta love it, painful but entertaining
Thank you for finally admitting your idea doesn’t work as you said and instead promotes the exact problems i outlined in my first post.
I’m sorry what did you think you proved I’m not following?
