could you do a coup once in the CSM, throw the others in jail and grab all the power for yourself?
Would be fitting of EVE, but alas no.
All changes to CSM would apply to me and my seat equally.
I could title myself âSupreme Dictatorâ, but that would be true in name only.
anarchy! just how i like it!
Correct.
Regular, high post count does however show I am not passive and will be very active in CSM issues/business.
I think there are more than enough players dissatisfied with the CSM program for me to get voted in on that platform.
It will be very challenging for me to reach them, but they are out there.
Yes.
49 posts to me, 42 posts to the remaining top 5, combined.
Vote for me, or dont.
Up to you.
PS: Where did your Futurama laughing gif dissappear?
Not laughing anymore?
I am still laughing, I can tell you. You running for CSM with your âI donât respond to criticism and only answer in circles until my critic realizes it doesnât make sense because I never answer anywayâ - mentality? That is one of the best jokes Iâve heard in years.
I donât know where that gif went too, but the fact that youâve seen it is all I needed.
On a second thought: maybe you could get a token place on the next CSM provided by goons, just to allow you the opportunity to realize that CSM is not exactly what you think it is.
Will you still be laughing if I get elected?
absolutely, yes.
My biggest concern about him actually winning a seat isnât the dumbass stuff he could do once there (this isnât a political office, and EVE isnât a democracy.) My concern is that then heâll somehow start posting to the forums even more, giving a patina of legitimacy to the cloud of dumbassery that stinks up every single thread heâs ever posted in. I mean, heâs only got like a 1% post rate where what heâs posted isnât complete garbage, and I canât imagine him somehow posting less often if he got on the CSM.

I canât imagine him somehow posting less often if he got on the CSM.
Probably less, as I will be busy with CSM business.
Also, I will be held to CSM standards, so I wont have the levity I currently have.

Probably less, as I will be busy with CSM business.
That is the most convincing argument for a vote for salvos. I can already imagine the slogan âvote me and youâll find less nonsense on forumsâ.
Shame though that only a minority reads forums. Probably not enough to make that happen.
lol, thatâs not exactly a promising platform: âVote for me and Iâll stop holding every potentially interesting thread hostage with my inability to form a coherent thought! Join the Getting-me-to-shut-up party!â
Btw:
Most CSM post their output to their own personal blog/twitter/websites.
Some post none at all.
I will post mine here in the appropriate CSM section.
(Ill add this to my campaign profile eventually)

Vote for me and Iâll stop holding every potentially interesting thread hostage with my inability to form a coherent thought!
Well, to be fair: I donât think he is unable to do that. Itâs just the fact that he only ever baits for lines he can morph into a positive argument for him, while absolutely disregarding everything else that is said in oposition to him.
Not sure if this is deliberate to make everyone else question humanity, or an illness of some sort but yeah, imho, he doesnât discuss anything and it would be an improvement in quality for these forums if he would insert himself less.
I can say that I absolutely 100% endorse this thread though, even though youâd have to be retarded to endorse the candidate. With 640 posts in a couple short days, itâs far more challenging to crap on the floor if youâre too busy crapping in the toilet.

Not sure if this is deliberate to make everyone else question humanity, or an illness of some sort
I think you should take a break, if posts here make you question humanity or illness of some sort.
I am human, and am not ill in any way.
Im in good health, both psychiatric and physical.

Im in good health, both psychiatric and physical.
Ah. So your posting history is a moral failing rather than a mental health failing. Good to know. However, thereâs a reason psych patients arenât typically allowed to treat themselves.
Also not a good sign: having to reassure potential voters youâre not fundamentally broken in spite of every ounce of evidence indicating the opposite.

Also not a good sign: having to reassure potential voters youâre not fundamentally broken in spite of every ounce of evidence indicating the opposite.
I think its a bad sign if you think you can diagnose someone else via what they say on an internet spaceship forum.

I think you should take a break, if posts here make you question humanity
I would say you shouldnât take part in a discussion when you are affraid of having your faith questioned. But then again, you and me do have a large gap when it comes down to what we think a discussion is.
And yes, this is not a discussion. Thatâs deliberate.